Logo

American Heart Association

  26
  0


Final ID: Sa1037

One-Year Outcomes of Bisoprolol vs Metoprolol Succinate in Patients with Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and End Stage Kidney Disease: A Propensity-Matched Study

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) represent a high-risk population in whom optimal beta-blocker selection remains unclear. While metoprolol succinate is commonly used, bisoprolol offers theoretical pharmacologic advantages including greater beta-1 selectivity and renal clearance properties, potentially influencing outcomes in ESRD patients undergoing dialysis. Unfortunateley real world head to head comparison data are very limited.

Research Question: Among patients with HFrEF and ESRD, does bisoprolol use confer improved 1-year cardiovascular outcomes compared with metoprolol succinate?

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, identifying adults ≥18 years with HFrEF and ESRD who initiated either bisoprolol(n=525) or metoprolol succinate (n=918) between January 2004 and December 2023. Patients with prior exposure to both agents were excluded. After one-to-one propensity score matching on demographics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular medications, 133 patients per group were analyzed. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, or death). Secondary outcomes included 4-point MACE (MACE + angina), hospitalization, and kidney transplantation. Risk ratios, hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed.

Results: Bisoprolol was associated with significantly lower 1-year all-cause mortality compared with metoprolol succinate (17.1% vs 29.7%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.34–0.99, p=0.023). MACE rates were lower with bisoprolol (19.7% vs 29.9%; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36–1.35), although not statistically significant. Similarly, 4-point MACE occurred less frequently with bisoprolol (16.4% vs 27.9%; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.30–1.32). No difference was observed in 1-year hospitalization rates (42.9% vs 42.1%; HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.70–1.47).

Conclusions: In this real-world, propensity-matched cohort of patients with HFrEF and ESRD, bisoprolol was associated with lower 1-year mortality compared with metoprolol succinate, but had comparable MACE and Hospitalization rates. These findings suggest bisoprolol may offer a survival benefit in this high-risk population and merit further prospective evaluation.
  • Okorigba, Efeturi  ( West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia , United States )
  • Hassan, Abdulraheem  ( Saint Peter's University hospital , New Brunswick , New Jersey , United States )
  • Tabot Ntoung, Clara Nkongho  ( West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia , United States )
  • Onigbanjo, Haroun  ( Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth University Hospital NHS Trust , Portsmouth , United Kingdom )
  • Ariahu, Nonso  ( College of Medicine, University of Lagos , Lagos , Nigeria )
  • Jimoh, Olufunmilayo  ( University Hospital Southampton NHS , Southampton , United Kingdom )
  • Ihuchukwu, Bruno  ( William Harvey Hospital , Kent , United Kingdom )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Efeturi Okorigba: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Abdulraheem Hassan: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Clara Nkongho Tabot Ntoung: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Haroun Onigbanjo: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Nonso Ariahu: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Olufunmilayo Jimoh: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Bruno Ihuchukwu: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Extending the Reach: Epidemiology and Therapeutic Innovation in Cardiovascular Care for Late-Stage CKD

Saturday, 11/08/2025 , 02:30PM - 03:30PM

Abstract Poster Board Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Clinical Responses to Aficamten Monotherapy Compared with Metoprolol Monotherapy for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes and Disease Burden: MAPLE-HCM Responder Analysis

Wang Andrew, Claggett Brian, Costabel Juan, Correia Edileide, Dybro Anne, Elliott Perry, Kulac Ian, Lakdawala Neal, Lewis Gregory, Mann Amy, Nair Ajith, Garcia-pavia Pablo, Poulsen Steen, Reant Patricia, Schulze Christian, Solomon Scott, Sohn Regina, Berhane Indrias, Heitner Stephen, Jacoby Daniel, Kupfer Stuart, Malik Fady, Masri Ahmad, Wohltman Amy, Fifer Michael, Maron Martin, Merkely Bela, Nassif Michael, Pena Pena Maria Luisa, Barriales-villa Roberto, Bilen Ozlem, Burroughs Melissa

A major effect of aprocitentan on albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension

Schlaich Markus, Bakris George, Flack John, Gimona Alberto, Narkiewicz Krzysztof, Sassi-sayadi Mouna, Wang Jiguang, Weber Michael

More abstracts from these authors:
Cardiovascular Outcomes Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Obese Adults Without Diabetes: A Propensity-Matched Real-World Study

Hassan Abdulraheem, Okorigba Efeturi, Olayiwola Olalekan, Otabor Emmanuel, Osineye Busayo, Oyeleye Tutuola, Manzoor Adil

Impact of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on patients with Heart failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and End Stage renal disease on dialysis. A propensity-matched analysis

Okorigba Efeturi, Mensah Samuel, Olayiwola Olalekan, Hassan Abdulraheem, Vaughan Megan, Otabor Emmanuel, Aghasili Chukwuemeka, Onigbanjo Haroun, Thyagaturu Harshith

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available