Logo

American Heart Association

  15
  0


Final ID: MP1976

Timing and outcomes of staged coronary artery bypass grafting following percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI – when should we intervene?

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction: While recommendations exist to guide timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) following STEMI, the optimal timing of staged CABG following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI is unclear. Our aim is to utilize national claims data to assess national practice patterns for the timing of staged CABG following PCI for STEMI, predictors of timing and patient presentation, and the association of timing with post-operative outcomes.

Methods: Inpatient Medicare MedPAR files were reviewed to identify patients aged ≥65 years who underwent isolated CABG from 10/2016-12/2021, who underwent urgent PCI for STEMI within the 12-months prior to CABG. Patients with a diagnosis of in-stent restenosis were excluded, isolating patients undergoing CABG for residual native disease. Timing of CABG relative to PCI was identified as same admission, elective readmission, and urgent readmission. The primary endpoint was five-year survival, assessed using propensity-matched Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. Comparison groups included same admission versus elective readmission, and elective versus urgent readmission. Among patients readmitted for CABG, predictors of presenting urgently were assessed utilizing logistic regression analysis.

Results: During the study period, 428,867 patients underwent isolated CABG; of those, 14,652 (3.4%) underwent urgent PCI for ACS in the 12-months prior to CABG. After excluding patients with in-stent stenosis and NSTEMI diagnosis, the final cohort consisted of 7,792 STEMI patients who underwent CABG within 12-months of PCI for residual native disease. Among this cohort, 3,532 (45.3%) had CABG during the same admission as PCI, 2,805 (36.0%) returned for elective CABG, and 1,466 (18.8%) returned urgently for CABG. Patients undergoing same admission CABG had inferior five-year survival than those readmitted electively; however, patients readmitted urgently also had significantly reduced five-year survival (Figure 1, Table 1). Patients with increased comorbidity burden were more likely to be re-admitted urgently for CABG, with the highest risk ≤14 days post-PCI (Table 2).

Conclusion: Among patients who undergo PCI for STEMI with residual coronary disease requiring CABG, optimal outcomes are observed in the setting of discharge and elective readmission; however, risk of disease progression and urgent readmission for revascularization must be weighed carefully.
  • Catalano, Michael  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Desai, Nimesh  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Brown, Chase  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Zhao, Yu  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Toubat, Omar  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Sperry, Alexandra  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Lutfi, Waseem  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Lawrence, Kendall  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Cevasco, Marisa  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Biscotti, Mauer  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Szeto, Wilson  ( University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Michael Catalano: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Nimesh Desai: No Answer | Chase Brown: No Answer | Yu Zhao: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Omar Toubat: No Answer | Alexandra Sperry: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Waseem Lutfi: No Answer | Kendall Lawrence: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Marisa Cevasco: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Abiomed:Active (exists now) | Mauer Biscotti: No Answer | Wilson Szeto: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Pharmacology and Coronary Revasc

Monday, 11/10/2025 , 10:45AM - 11:35AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A multi-task deep learning algorithm for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease using fundus photographs

Zeng Yong, Ding Yaodong

A Bridge from Sweet to Sour: A Case of Recurrent Myocardial Stunning in Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Satish Vikyath, Pargaonkar Sumant, Slipczuk Leandro, Schenone Aldo, Maliha Maisha, Chi Kuan Yu, Sunil Kumar Sriram, Borkowski Pawel, Vyas Rhea, Rodriguez Szaszdi David Jose Javier, Kharawala Amrin, Seo Jiyoung

More abstracts from these authors:
Early Re-Initiation of Optimal Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection is Associated with Decreased Mortality

Sperry Alexandra, Zhao Yu, Catalano Michael, Goel Nicholas, Brown Chase, Szeto Wilson, Genuardi Michael, Desai Nimesh

Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support – A Single-Center Experience

Kuznetsov Ivan, Bermudez Christian, Wald Joyce, Kieserman Jake, Toubat Omar, Ranum Alison, Peterson Adrian, Brown Alyson, Biscotti Mauer, King Jacob, Cevasco Marisa

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available