Logo

American Heart Association

  15
  0


Final ID: Sun104

Underventilation with a Small Adult Bag (1,000 ml): Persistent Gaps Despite Real-Time Flow-Guided Training

Abstract Body: Introduction/Background
Manual ventilation is a critical, yet variable skill in prehospital and hospital care. Concerns of over-ventilation (tidal volume, rate, etc.) during bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation have led many EMS systems to adopt smaller resuscitator bags, with the risk of underventilation.

Research Question/Hypothesis
Can a small adult bag provide adequate ventilation for an average adult male, and can performance be improved after a brief educational intervention using software to measure flow and tidal volume, along with a flow limiting device to encourage more aggressive bag compression to achieve adequate tidal volume, while preventing over-ventilation by mechanically limiting inspiratory flow.

Methods/Approach
55 first responders from Johnson County, KS participated in a pre/post study. Participants were instructed to provide 60 seconds of manual ventilation to a simulated healthy adult male (target Vt: 420-570 ml) using their standard small adult bag (VENTLAB AirFlow 1000 mL). Tidal volume (Vt), peak flow rate, and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded (SotairIQ training platform; SafeBVM, Boston).
Afterward, providers completed a 2-minute training video and 1-minute hands-on flow training with a valve which stops inspiratory flow if it exceeds 55 LPM (Sotair, SafeBVM, Boston) and SotairIQ. They then repeated the same task using the same bag with the Sotair inline.

Results/Data
Mean peak flow rates and Vt were higher after training (44.5+5.2 vs 28.3+12 LPM; p<0.05; 418+38.6 vs 323.2+92.2 ml; p<0.05). Before training, 87.8% of breaths were <420 mL compared to 51.5% post-training (p<0.05). Baseline respiratory rate was 9.73+2.49, compared to 11.8+4.36 after training; p<0.05. Estimated alveolar ventilation (assuming a dead space of 150 ml) increased from 1776.7 to 3409.7 ml/minute after training (p<.0.05).

Conclusion(s)
The small adult bag (1,000 ml) leads to smaller tidal volumes than recommended for an average adult male; and (2) although the training tool (+ flow-limiting device) led to a near doubling in estimated alveolar ventilation, many breaths were still suboptimal after training. These results provide further evidence for the inadequacy of small bags in ventilating adults, but suggest that training and the use of a flow-limiting device may improve the quality of ventilation when a small bag is used..
  • Joles, Kevin  ( Olathe Fire Department , Olathe , Kansas , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Kevin Joles: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:

Resuscitation Science Symposium 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Airway management

Sunday, 11/09/2025 , 01:30PM - 03:00PM

ReSS25 Poster Session and Reception

More abstracts on this topic:
Airway Opening Index in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Nassal Michelle, Carlson Jestin, Stephens Shannon, Panchal Ashish, Wang Henry, Smith Rachel, Idris Ahamed, Jaureguibeitia Xabier, Aramendi Elisabete, Elola Andoni, Daya Mohamud, Nichol Graham, Aufderheide Tom

Comparison of Manual Versus Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pediatric Swine

Lapid Francis, Javdan Cameron, Maimie Kpehe, Lage Larraine, Obrien Caitlin, Shaffner Donald

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available