Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: 28

Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation did not add benefit to stance-phase gait training using virtual reality setting for chronic motor deficits after stroke

Abstract Body: Introduction: Chronic gait deficits after stroke are prevalent. Current therapy fails to restore normal gait for many stroke survivors. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, is a promising adjunct intervention that may enhance motor-learning induced neuroplasticity. tDCS is readily deployable into the clinic owing to its safety, ease of set-up, and feasibility to be paired with gait therapies. Our objective was to test whether bihemispheric tDCS would improve response to stance-phase focused gait therapy in a double-blind randomized control trial. Methods: 44 subjects (65.2±9.8 y/o; 27.3% female; 4.5±4.2 years post-stroke) were randomized to active or sham tDCS+gait training. Ten treatment sessions consisted of 30 min of virtual-reality obstacle clearance training on a treadmill followed by 30 min of overground stance phase training. 2mA tDCS with anode over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) and cathode over contralesional M1 was applied during the first 15 min of training. Individuals were assigned custom home exercises. Primary outcome was fastest gait speed with 10-meter walk test(10MWT) and secondary outcomes were preferred gait speed during 2-min walk test(2MWT), Fugl-Meyer(FM), Timed Up and Go(TUG), Functional Gait Assessment (FGA), and Gait Assessment and Intervention Tool(GAIT). Outcomes were collected at baseline, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and 6-week follow up. Statistical analyses included longitudinal linear mixed-effects models and analysis of treatment group by time interaction effects. Results: At baseline(mean(SD)): 10MWT=0.71(0.40) m/s, 2MWT=0.55(0.28) m/s, FM=25.0(3.7), TUG =33.2(30.6) s; FGA=12.7(4.1) points, GAIT=16.9(7.3) points. None of the longitudinal linear mixed-effects models detected a significant group by time interaction. However, there were significant improvements from baseline for all measures as follows (median(95%CI)): 10MWT(m/s) of 0.12(0.08, 0.16) post-treatment, and 0.11(0.07, 0.16) at follow-up; 2MWT(m/s) of 0.05(0.03, 0.07) and 0.05(0.02, 0.09); FM (points) of 2.5(2, 3) and 3(2.5,3.5); TUG(s) of 3.9(2.5, 5.6) and 3.3(2, 5.2); FGA(points) 3(2.5,3.5) and 3(2,3.5); GAIT(points) of 2.5(2, 3.5) and 3(2,4). Conclusions: Bihemispheric tDCS did not enhance improvements that were achieved by a 10-session gait training intervention targeting stance phase.
  • Pundik, Svetlana  ( CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Mccabe, Jessica  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Skelly, Margaret  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Salameh, Ahlam  ( Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine , Independence , Ohio , United States )
  • Duncan, Kelsey  ( University Hospitals CMC , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Mosca, Luke  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Leonhardt, Lisa  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Hisel, Terri  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Hardin, Elizabeth  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Zink, Elizabeth  ( Cleveland VA Medical Center , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Svetlana Pundik: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Jessica McCabe: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Margaret Skelly: No Answer | Ahlam Salameh: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Kelsey Duncan: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Luke Mosca: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Lisa Leonhardt: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Terri Hisel: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Elizabeth Hardin: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Elizabeth Zink: No Answer
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Clinical Rehabilitation and Recovery Oral Abstracts

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 09:15AM - 10:45AM

Oral Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Estimated Electrical Field With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Response to Gait Therapy Combined With tDCS in Chronic Stroke Patients

Yaghmoor Bassam, Hardin Elizabeth, Zink Elizabeth, Pundik Svetlana, Skelly Margaret, Mccabe Jessica, Salameh Ahlam, Bikson Marom, Duncan Kelsey, Mosca Luke, Leonhardt Lisa, Hisel Terri

Aerobic Physical Activity, Resistance Exercise, and Sedentary Times of Stroke Survivors

Lee Eung-joon, Kim Seung Jae, Bae Jeonghoon, Jeong Haebong

More abstracts from these authors:
Endovascular Thrombectomy Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Oral Anticoagulation Use: Secondary Analysis From the SELECT Study

Yaghmoor Bassam, Opaskar Amanda, Sila Cathy, Xiong Wei, Degeorgia Michael, Duncan Kelsey, Hu Yin, Ray Abhishek, Sunshine Jeffrey, Bambakidis Nicholas, Sarraj Amrou, Narangoli Adeeb, Pujara Deep, Al-shaibi Faisal, Saidi Yazid, Shafiq Ameena, Al Mostaneer Alhassin, Albedaiwi Mohammed, Sundararajan Sophia

Estimated Electrical Field With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Response to Gait Therapy Combined With tDCS in Chronic Stroke Patients

Yaghmoor Bassam, Hardin Elizabeth, Zink Elizabeth, Pundik Svetlana, Skelly Margaret, Mccabe Jessica, Salameh Ahlam, Bikson Marom, Duncan Kelsey, Mosca Luke, Leonhardt Lisa, Hisel Terri

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)