Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: WP132

A Novel Approach of Monitoring Stroke Recovery: Contactless Sensor for Gait Speed and Fugl-Meyer Action Duration Estimation

Abstract Body: Objectives: Gait speed and motor deficits are key determinants of functional recovery, dependence, and disability in stroke survivors. Traditional methods of assessing these involve in-person observation and measurements by a healthcare provider. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a contactless sensor to estimate gait speed and the duration of actions in a Fugl-Meyer (FM) assessment.

Methods: A contactless sensor with a processing unit was developed to estimate gait speed and FM action duration. The device transmits low-power radio-frequency signals (similar frequency used in 5G smartphones) and analyzes reflections from the subject's body. By filtering spatial and temporal frequencies, an algorithm identifies 3D body structure, separates walking periods, and calculates gait speed from time and distance. For FM actions, the algorithm identifies features associated with 3D movements of arms and legs, extracting segments with the highest feature template matching. We compared the contactless sensor measurements with the standard manual measurements (Figures).

Results: Ten stroke survivors (mean age 62.4 years, standard deviation or SD = 11.8) with self-selected gait speeds of 0.18 to 0.85 m/s and ten control subjects (mean age 31.6 years, SD = 17.7) with gait speeds of 0.80 to 1.31 m/s were evaluated. For stroke survivors, the sensor showed a high correlation (R = 0.99) with manual gait speed measurements, with error mean and SD of 0.03 and 0.02 m/s. For control subjects, the correlation was moderate (R = 0.68), with error mean and SD of 0.14 and 0.10 m/s. So, the sensor is better suited for automatic estimation of low to moderate gait speeds (0.18 m/s to 0.85 m/s). In FM assessments, the sensor accurately estimated lower-extremity action duration with mean errors of 0.60 s and 0.53 s for stroke survivors and controls. Upper-extremity action duration estimates were less accurate than the lower-extremity, but the errors are still less than 2.21 s and 1.89 s for stroke survivors and controls.

Conclusions: In conclusion, the contactless sensor demonstrated high accuracy in estimating gait speed and showed promising results in estimating the duration of lower- and upper-extremity actions in FM assessments for stroke survivors. This technology could facilitate personalized recovery monitoring in variable environments, including home/health care facilities, potentially triggering rehabilitation needs to improve patient outcomes.
  • Gu, Zhuangzhuang  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Titus, Ryan  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Regmi, Hem  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Tavasoli, Reza  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Sur, Sanjib  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Sen, Souvik  ( UNIVERSITY SOUTH CAROLINA , Columbia , South Carolina , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Zhuangzhuang Gu: No Answer | Ryan Titus: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Hem Regmi: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Reza Tavasoli: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Sanjib Sur: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Souvik Sen: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Clinical Rehabilitation and Recovery Posters I

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 07:00PM - 07:30PM

Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts from these authors:
Contactless and Cameraless Monitoring of Bed Transition Times in Stroke Survivors: A Novel Sensor-Based Approach

Adhikari Aakriti, Sur Sanjib, Sen Souvik

A Contactless and Automated Approach to the Acute Stroke Assessment

Saadat Moh, Titus Ryan, Verkuilen Haley, Fleming Phil, Sur Sanjib, Sen Souvik

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)