Logo

American Heart Association

  10
  0


Final ID: WE455

Effect of Spironolactone versus Alpha or Beta Blockers on Systolic BP in Patients with Resistant Hypertension

Abstract Body: Introduction. The optimal fourth-line drug therapy for resistant hypertension remains uncertain. We emulated a target trial of initiating spironolactone versus an alpha or beta blocker as an add-on therapy on blood pressure (BP) control in patients with resistant hypertension (RH).
Methods. We emulated sequential trials for adults with resistant hypertension, defined as having a systolic BP > 130 mm Hg while concurrently on three classes of anti-hypertensive medication. We included patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VA) who met eligibility criteria between 2016 and 2022 who initiated one of three add-on medications for treatment of RH: spironolactone, an alpha-1 blocker, or a beta blocker. We applied inverse probability of treatment weights using >50 baseline covariates to approximate randomization. The outcome of interest was the difference in change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 months and baseline to 12 months between spironolactone and other drug classes, estimated through a weighted linear mixed effects model.
Results. Among 918 adults who initiated spironolactone, 916 adults who initiated an alpha-1 blocker, and 3690 patients who initiated a beta blocker (mean age 67.6 years [SD, 9.7], mean systolic BP 146.7 mm Hg [SD, 13.1]), the average duration of continuous treatment was 14.7 months (SD, 9.5), 11.7 months (SD, 9.8), and 15.8 (SD, 9.6) months respectively. The change in systolic BP from baseline to 6 and 12 months was 7 mm Hg (95% CI, 6, 8) and 9 mm Hg (8, 11) respectively for spironolactone; 6 mm Hg [5, 7] and 7 mm Hg [5, 8]) for an alpha 1 blocker; and 5 mm Hg [4, 6] and 5 mm Hg [4, 6]) for a beta blocker. The difference between change in systolic BP at 12 months between spironolactone versus an alpha-1 blocker or beta blockers was significantly larger for spironolactone at 12 months (vs alpha-1 blockers, 3 mm Hg [1, 5]; vs beta blockers, 3 mm Hg [2, 5]).
Conclusions. Spironolactone was more effective add-on fourth-line therapy for systolic BP lowering in the treatment of RH, supporting findings from PATHWAY-2 in a larger population with more comorbidity.
  • Li, June  ( Stanford University , Stanford , California , United States )
  • Montez-rath, Maria  ( Stanford University , Stanford , California , United States )
  • Odden, Michelle  ( Stanford University , Palo Alto , California , United States )
  • Tamura, Manjula  ( Stanford University , Stanford , California , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
Meeting Info:

EPI-Lifestyle Scientific Sessions 2026

2026

Boston, Massachusetts

Session Info:

Poster Session 2

Wednesday, 03/18/2026 , 05:00PM - 07:00PM

Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A Comparative Study Of Social Determinants, Hypertension, And Life Essential Factors In Alabama And Colorado From The 2021 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Chukwunyere Chibuike, Owuor Kevin

Association of Antihypertensive Medications with Orthostatic Hypotension among Very Old Adults: Findings from the ARIC Study

Khan Md Marufuzzaman, Coresh Joe, Selvin Elizabeth, Wagenknecht Lynne, Hughes Timothy, Windham B Gwen, Mosley Thomas, Lutsey Pamela, Ring Kimberly, Lipsitz Lewis, Valint Arielle, Col Hannah, Juraschek Stephen, Larbi Fredrick, Patil Dhrumil, Zhang Mingyu, Turkson-ocran Ruth-alma, Ngo Long, Cluett Jennifer, Mukamal Kenneth

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available