Efficacy of Radiation Protective Shields on Operator Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. AHA Conference Repository

American Heart Association

145

Final ID: Su3132

Efficacy of Radiation Protective Shields on Operator Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background:
The cumulative exposure to X-ray radiation during cardiac intervention can indeed pose various health risks. This meta-analysis aims to compare radiation protective shields (drapes and X-ray shields) versus conventional safety measures (lead apron) on the operator’s procedural radiation exposure during cardiac interventions.

Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. We used the random-effects model to report continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results:
We included 16 RCTs with 3370 patients. Radiation shields were significantly associated with low total operator radiation dose (MD: -7.3, 95%CI [-11.9, -2.7], P< 0.01) with no significant difference between both arms regarding chest radiation dose (MD: -20.7, 95%CI [-48.9, 7.6], P= 0.15) and thyroid radiation dose (MD: -15.4, 95%CI [-32.4, 1.7], P= 0.08).
Also, shields were significantly associated with low air kerma (MD: -46.4, 95%CI [-87.3, -5.5], P= 0.03) and low fluoroscopy duration (MD: -0.3, 95%CI [-0.6, -0.04], P= 0.02). However, there was no difference between both arms regarding the total procedure time (MD: -0.7, 95%CI [-3.1, 1.6], P= 0.54), contrast volume (MD: -3.2, 95%CI [-10.2, 3.7], P= 0.36), and dose area product (MD: 628.4, 95% CI [-3466.9, 4723.8], P= 0.76). Also, we found no differences between drape and shields subgroups in all outcomes.

Conclusion:
Radiation protection shields significantly reduced the total radiation dose exposure and air kerma. Also, shields are associated with lower fluoroscopy duration, insignificant lower procedure time, and contrast volume.

Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad ( Benha University , Benha , Egypt )
Almohtasib, Yazan ( University of Missouri-Kansas City , Kansas City , Missouri , United States )
Abuelazm, Mohamed ( Tanta University , Tanta , Egypt )
Amin, Ahmed Mazen ( Mansoura university , Mansoura , Egypt )
Almahdy Mohamed, Ahmed ( University of Minnesota Twin Cities , St Paul , Minnesota , United States )
Altobaishat, Obieda ( Jordan University of Science and Te , Irbid , Jordan )
Abdelhalem, Ahmed ( Tanta University , Tanta , Egypt )
Imran, Muhammad ( The University of Lahore , Lahore , Pakistan )
Abdelazeem, Basel ( West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia , United States )

Author Disclosures:

Ahmed Saad Elsaeidy:

No Answer

Yazan Almohtasib: