A Polygenic Score to Identify Risk of Incident Stroke and Benefit from Primary Prevention Statin Therapy
Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Primary prevention statin use has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of stroke, however, clinical risk scores for statin eligibility do not predict stroke specifically. A polygenic risk score (PRS) for stroke is a tool that may help identify individuals at greatest risk of stroke and most likely to benefit from statin therapy.
Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study using genotyped individuals from a large primary prevention RCT (JUPITER), which tested rosuvastatin 20 mg daily vs placebo. We applied the validated GIGASTROKE PRS categorized by quintiles: low (Q1), moderate (Q2-Q4) or high risk (Q5). The primary outcome was occurrence of all-cause stroke. PRS risk was modeled per 1-SD and hazard ratios calculated for the moderate and high-risk groups relative to low risk. Formal testing of treatment interaction for rosuvastatin and PRS was performed.
Results: Of 8,749 patients with genetic data (32% male, mean age 66), the median LDL-C was 110 mg/dL and hsCRP was 4.05 mg/L. During 4 years of follow up, 44 patients suffered a stroke. The PRS was strongly associated with risk of incident stroke (Fig, A). Compared to those at low genetic risk, the absolute risk of stroke was more than 2-fold greater in the moderate group (HR: 2.10, 0.78-5.67) and nearly 4-fold greater in the high-risk group (HR: 3.72, 1.27-10.88, p-trend =0.011). In this genetic cohort, rosuvastatin reduced the risk of stroke by 61% (HR: 0.39, 0.20-0.76, p=0.006). The relative risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 37% (HR 0.63, 0.11-3.77), 63% (HR 0.37, 0.16-0.88), and 68% (HR 0.32, 0.09-1.17) in low, moderate, and high-risk groups, respectively. The absolute risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 0.13% (-0.38-0.63), 0.46% (0.08-0.84), and 0.76% (-0.03-1.56) (Fig, B). Rosuvastatin in the high-risk subgroup reduced the incidence of stroke to the level of the low-risk subgroup receiving placebo (0.35%).
Conclusion: A PRS can identify primary prevention patients with a 2 to 4-fold increased risk of stroke, which appears to be largely offset with statin therapy. As the use of PRSs increase in clinical practice, it may be a useful tool to help guide statin initiation for primary stroke prevention.
Mcclintick, Daniel
( Brigham and Womens Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Kamanu, Frederick
( Brigham and Womens Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Melloni, Giorgio
( Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Sabatine, Marc
( Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Ruff, Christian
( BRIGHAM WOMENS HOSPITAL
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Ridker, Paul
( BRIGHAM WOMENS HOSPITAL
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Chasman, Daniel
( Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Marston, Nicholas
( Brigham And Womens Hospital
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Author Disclosures:
Daniel McClintick:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Frederick Kamanu:No Answer
| Giorgio Melloni:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Marc Sabatine:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Amgen:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Pfizer:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Novartis:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Merck:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Ionis:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:AstraZeneca:Active (exists now)
; Individual Stocks/Stock Options:AstraZeneca:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Anthos:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Anthos:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Amgen:Active (exists now)
| Christian Ruff:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Anthos:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Merck:Past (completed)
; Consultant:Pfizer:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Janssen:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Daiichi Sankyo:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Bristol Meyers Squibb:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Bayer:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Anthos:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Novartis:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Janssen:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Daiichi Sankyo:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):AstraZeneca:Active (exists now)
| Paul Ridker:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Researcher:NovoNordisk:Active (exists now)
; Ownership Interest:Uppton, Bitteroot, Angiowave ,:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:NovoNordisk, Agepha, Ardelyx, Arrowhead, CSK Behring, SOCAR, Eli Lilly, New Amsterdam, cardio Therapeutics, Uppton:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:NHLBI:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Pfizer:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Kowa:Active (exists now)
| Daniel Chasman:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Nicholas Marston:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Speaker:Amgen:Past (completed)
; Researcher:Pfizer:Past (completed)
; Consultant:NewAmsterdam:Past (completed)
; Researcher:Marea:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Ionis:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Amgen:Active (exists now)
Xu Xiaohong, Preeti Preeti, Yu Ruoying, Shaykhalishahi Hamed, Zhang Cheng, Shen Chuanbin, Li Bei, Tang Naping, Chang Yan, Xiang Qian, Cui Yimin, Lei Xi, Ni Heyu, Zhu Guangheng, Liu Zhenze, Hu Xudong, Slavkovic Sladjana, Neves Miguel, Ma Wenjing, Xie Huifang