CMR can discriminate need for biopsy and rejection therapy in children post heart transplant
Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Heart transplantation remains definitive therapy for children with heart failure, but the burden of acute graft rejection remains. While adult data has shown cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) offers reliable, non-invasive identification of graft rejection1-3, endo-myocardial biopsy (EMB) continues to be the gold-standard in children.
Hypothesis: CMR can establish the presence/absence of rejection, guiding need for EMB and rejection therapy.
Aims: To assess the (1) strength of CMR parametric mapping in discriminating presence of rejection (defined as need for new therapy), and (2) the ability of CMR to identify patients without rejection, negating the need for EMB.
Methods: Pediatric heart transplant patients referred for EMB underwent concurrent noncontrast CMR with volumetry, flows, MOLLI T1 and T2 parametric mapping at 1.5T. Average and peak segmental native T1 and T2 were measured in 6 slices, and regions of sub-segmental ‘hotspot’ elevation (3 continuous voxels T1>1050 ms or T2>60 ms) were identified. Rejection treatment was per institutional protocol, blinded to CMR results, categorized as (A)new IV therapy, (B)oral augmentation of maintenance, or (C) no change. Sensitivity, specificity and ROC analyses were performed.
Results: 95 encounters in 34 patients (median age 13.1y (IQR 7.5-16.3), BSA 1.37 m2 (1.1-1.6), 47% female) were completed, with treatment groups A 13%, B 5%, and C 82%. Significantly higher T1 and T2 values were found in the rejection groups. ROC curve analysis identified elevated peak T1 levels as the strongest predictor of rejection (AUC = 0.848, 95% CI: 0.746, 0.950, p<0.001), with optimal cutoff T1 >1099 ms. Subsegmental hotspots were present in all encounters with rejection requiring new therapy (100% sensitivity), however the type/ number of hotspots did not correlate with rejection. New rejection therapy was not initiated in any patient encounter without hotspots (NPV 100%).
Conclusions: Elevated segmental T1 CMR values can identify children with graft rejection, and absence of subsegmental hotspot elevations can reliably identify patients without rejection. CMR is a promising non-invasive test to aid in graft surveillance and direct invasive testing and therapy.
Vegulla, Ravi
( Childrens National Medical Center
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Staffa, Steven
( Boston Children's Hospital and Harv
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Zurakowski, David
( Boston Children's Hospital and Harv
, Boston
, Massachusetts
, United States
)
Cross, Russell
( Nemours Childrens Hospital, Delaware
, Rehoboth Beach
, Delaware
, United States
)
Olivieri, Laura
( UPMC Childrens Hospital Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh
, Pennsylvania
, United States
)
Ceneri, Nicolle
( Children's National Hospital
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Richmann, Devika
( NYP--Columbia--CHONY
, New York
, New York
, United States
)
Mouzakis, Nicholas
( Children's National Medical Center
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Hamman, Karin
( Children's National Medical Center
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Kanter, Joshua
( Children's National Medical Center
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Berger, John
( CHILDRENS NATIONAL Hospital
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Downing, Tacy
( Children's National Medical Center
, Washiton
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Loke, Yue-hin
( Children's National Medical Center
, Washington
, District of Columbia
, United States
)
Author Disclosures:
Ravi Vegulla:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Steven Staffa:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| David Zurakowski:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Russell Cross:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Laura Olivieri:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Nicolle Ceneri:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Devika Richmann:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Nicholas Mouzakis:No Answer
| Karin Hamman:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| joshua kanter:No Answer
| John Berger:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Merck Sharp and Dohme:Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Actelion:Past (completed)
| Tacy Downing:No Answer
| Yue-Hin Loke:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships