Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction: Hope has been positively associated with behavior change in individuals screened for cardiovascular risk, and negatively associated with fatal ischemic heart disease (IHD). Hopelessness is associated with increased risk of mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with IHD, and negatively associated with physical activity outcomes. Hope and hopelessness are sometimes considered to be ends of a continuum, yet the relationship between hope and hopelessness is not commonly examined in IHD patients.

Aim: To determine the relationship between the State-Trait Hopelessness Scale (STHS) and Snyder Adult State and Adult Trait Hope Scales in a sample of patients with IHD.

Hypotheses: 1) There would be an inverse relationship between hopelessness and hope as measured by the scales and 2) discriminant validity of the instruments would be confirmed.

Methods: A total of 156 participants were enrolled as part of a 3-group randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to promote physical activity and reduce hopelessness. Data were collected two weeks after hospital discharge. Correlations and partial correlations were computed for all combinations of scales. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted on hope and hopelessness scales.

Results: A total of 106 participants (68%) had moderate or high trait hope, and 92 (59%) had moderate or high state. Moderate or severe hopelessness was reported by 93 participants (59.6%) for state hopelessness and 108 participants (69.2%) for trait. There were moderately strong negative correlations (r=-0.54 to -0.66, p=<0.001) between the total STHS and the Snyder Hope scales for both full and short versions of the STHS. Correlations were virtually unchanged when adjusted for age, sex, cardiac diagnosis, and marital status (r=-0.5 to -0.63, p<0.001) indicating that as hopelessness increases, hope decreases. PCA revealed 4 factors that explained 64.7% of the variance in scores while demonstrating conceptual distinctions between the STHS and Snyder Hope scales.

Conclusions: As hypothesized, as hopelessness increased, hope decreased; however, we found a proportion of patients with hopelessness who still expressed hope for the future. Discriminant validity was supported by inverse correlations and factor analyses indicating conceptual distinctions between the two instruments. Interventions to reduce hopelessness for patients with IHD may be successful since hope and hopelessness are not mutually exclusive.