Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here):

Case Description

A 68-year-old man with end-stage renal disease on dialysis, peripheral vascular disease with metatarsal amputations, atrial fibrillation and type 1 diabetes was admitted for foot osteomyelitis secondary to MSSA bacteremia.
Transesophageal echocardiogram revealed mobile mitral valve vegetations up to 1.8cm on the atrial aspect of the posterior mitral valve leaflet which prolapsed through the mitral valve during diastole. Ejection fraction was 60% and there was trivial-mild mitral regurgitation without valvular destruction or peri-annular extension into the mitral annulus. MRI brain showed bilateral cerebral and cerebellar hemispheric infarcts, consistent with acute embolic stroke.
He was at high risk for both recurrent embolism and operative mortality (STS risk score 51%) due to his comorbidities and risk of hemorrhagic conversion of stroke. After shared decision making, percutaneous aspiration of the mitral vegetation was performed with AngioVac (Fig). Cerebral embolism protection devices were deployed prior to AngioVac evacuation of the mass.
There was no residual mitral regurgitation and only a small vegetation strand remained (Fig). Surgical pathology confirmed MSSA endocarditis. Blood cultures remained negative, and the patient did not suffer from recurrent embolic events. The patient underwent revision metatarsal amputation and was discharged with a 6-week course of IV cefazolin.

Discussion

Infective endocarditis with high embolic risk is life-threatening and challenging to treat in patients with high surgical risk. We illustrate a case of percutaneous vegetation aspiration using the AngioVac device in our patient who suffered from embolic strokes due to MSSA mitral valve endocarditis. Meta-analyses have shown clinically successful debulking in 90% of cases, with 82% of patients able to clear bacteremia with AngioVac. Although most commonly used in right-sided lesions, percutaneous debulking of left-sided endocarditis with AngioVac and cerebral protection can be considered as a treatment strategy in select patients with prohibitive surgical risk.