Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction: The efficacy and safety of use and impact of pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with Impella remains unclear. The use of PAC in conjunction with Impella for patients with CS might be associated with improved clinical outcomes and increased safety compared to the use of Impella alone. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Impella with versus without PAC for patients with CS.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing PAC use in patients with CS treated with Impella. We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) applying random-effects model. We used R version 4.3.2 for statistical analyses.

Results: We included two observational studies comprising 11,463 patients, of whom 6,058 (53%) had PAC. Compared with no PAC, the use of PAC was associated with a significantly lower in short-term mortality rates (37% vs. 42%; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p<0.01; Figure 1A). There was no significant difference in the incidence of arrhythmias 59% vs. 63%; OR 1.14; 95% CI 0.92-1.41 p=0.44; Figure 1B) or renal complications between groups (47% vs. 50%; OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.00-1.17; p=0.06; Figure 1C).

Conclusions: In patients with CS, adjunctive PAC to Impella is associated with lower mortality rates, but no significant difference in arrhythmias and renal complications. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to further validate this results.