Logo

American Heart Association

  15
  0


Final ID: TP4

Characterization of Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) patients excluded from thrombolysis due to recent NOAC use.

Abstract Body: Introduction: Current guidelines exclude patients with recent NOAC use from thrombolysis, even if they present during the 4.5hr timeframe. Emerging data suggest there may not be an increased risk of hemorrhagic conversion for patients who receive thrombolysis despite recent NOAC use. At a large urban Joint Commission certified comprehensive stroke center, a retrospective analysis was conducted to identify characteristics of patients excluded from thrombolytic due to NOAC use.

Methods: The GWTG database was queried for patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting (time frame) within 4.5 of last known well. A total of 1,933 AIS patients were identified). A total of 5.0 % (n=96) of these patients were excluded due to recent NOAC use. A chi-squared analysis was performed to determine if there was a significant difference based on sex, race, age, history of heart disease and statin use. A pooled T-test analysis was also performed to determine if a significant difference exists between the mRS and NIHSS at baseline and at discharge within the excluded patients group.

Results: Patients excluded from IVT due to recent NOAC use were more likely to take cholesterol reducer (67.1% vs 45.6%). The NOAC exclusion group were more likely to have medical co-morbidities including Afib/Aflutter, prosthetic heart valves, CAD/prior MI, heart failure, prior DVT/PE and sleep apnea (Table 1). Both groups had an equal probability of having a history of a previous stroke. There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics (race, sex,etc.) between the two groups.

Among the patients excluded from IVT due to recent NOAC use: 54.2% (n=52) had a normal EF, 10.8 % (n=10) had a thrombus visualized on TTE, 49.0 % (n=47) had a L.MCA stroke. 80.2% (n=77) had plans to restart their AC on discharge: Apixaban 45.8% (n=44), Rivaroxaban 11.5% (n=11) and Dabigatran 2.1 % (n=11). The median mRS at baseline was 1 and at discharge was 4.

Conclusion: Patients excluded from IVT due to recent NOAC use were more likely to have cardiovascular co-morbidities. If NOAC exclusion is removed in the future, 1 in 20 patients could potentially become eligible for IVT, and MRS worsening due to stroke can potentially be avoided.
  • Mok, Kent  ( University of Maryland School of Medicine , Rockville , Maryland , United States )
  • Palmisano, Caitlin  ( UMMC , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Mcardle, Patrick  ( UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Mehndiratta, Prachi  ( UMMC , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Chaturvedi, Seemant  ( UMMC , Baltimore , Maryland , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Kent Mok: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Caitlin Palmisano: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Patrick McArdle: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Prachi Mehndiratta: No Answer | Seemant Chaturvedi: No Answer
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Acute Treatment: Systemic Thrombolysis and Cerebroprotection Posters II

Thursday, 02/06/2025 , 07:00PM - 07:30PM

Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Antithrombotic trends before and after publication of randomized clinical trials in cervical artery dissection: A secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD Study

Penckofer Mary, Salehi Omran Setareh, Seiffge David, Arnold Marcel, Marialuisa Zedde, Zubair Adeel, Marto Joao Pedro, Ghannam Malik, Engelter Stefan, Traenka Christopher, Mac Grory Brian, Shu Liqi, Kam Wayneho, Elnazeir Marwa, Romoli Michele, Saleh Velez Faddi, Siegler James, Strelecky Lukas, Yaghi Shadi, Henninger Nils, Muppa Jayachandra, Bakradze Ekaterina, Heldner Mirjam, Katheryna Antonenko

30-Day Outcomes of Dual vs Triple Antithrombotic Therapy After PCI

Meeks William, Slone Sarah, Barringhaus Kurt

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)