Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: DP20

An Evaluation of Stroke Literature Pamphlets For Stroke Patients

Abstract Body: Background: The American Stroke Association developed a series of pamphlets aimed at educating patients and families about strokes (https://www.stroke.org/en/professionals/stroke-resource-library), and these materials are often used by healthcare professionals to help communicate critical information about strokes. The effectiveness of these pamphlets depends on the readability of the content. Given that the average American is able to comfortably read at an eighth-grade level or below, it is essential to assess whether these materials are appropriately tailored to meet the needs of the general public.
Methods: This study evaluated 50 stroke-related pamphlets available in the PDF format from the American Stroke Association website, which fell into one of three categories: prevention, acute treatment, and post-stroke care. The text from each pamphlet was analyzed using the Gunning Fog index and Flesch-Kincaid Ease and Grade level programs. All of the values for each of the PDF were recorded in an excel sheet for further data analysis.
Results: The average Gunning Fog Index was 13.1 ± 4.0 (SD) (equivalent to at least some college level education) and the average Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 10.1 ± 3.8 (SD) (equivalent to around a 10th grade education). To meet the readability standards appropriate for an 8th grade education level or below, target scores should be below 8.5 for Gunning Fog Index and 8.5 for Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level.
Conclusion:
The patient education materials analyzed in this study were equivalent to 10th and 13th grade reading level. These findings highlight the need for improving the readability of patient education resources by adjusting language and explanations to lower education levels.
Keywords: stroke, readability, health literacy, patient education
  • Degen, Nathaniel  ( Banner University Medical Center , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Sivakumar, Milan  ( Banner University Medical Center , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Varkey, Thomas  ( Banner University Medical Center , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Alexandrov, Andrei  ( University of Arizona COMP , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Singh, Savdeep  ( University of Arizona , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Nathaniel Degen: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Milan Sivakumar: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Thomas Varkey: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Andrei Alexandrov: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Savdeep Singh: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Cerebrovascular Systems of Care Moderated Digital Posters

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 01:20PM - 01:50PM

Moderated Digital Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Patient-Clinician Communication and Cardiovascular Outcomes: An Analysis of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL), 2008-2019

Slavin Samuel, Mittleman Murray, Daviglus Martha, Garcia-bedoya Olga, Mossavar-rahmani Yasmin, Perreira Krista, Wassertheil-smoller Sylvia, Ramos Alberto, Sotres-alvarez Daniela, Telzak Andrew

Large Language Models Improve Readability in Primary Responses to Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Questions for Patient Education

Paruchuri Venkata, Patel Dhaval, Fang Alexander, Levitch Ethan, Kiely Conor, Kaur Karmveer, Sikder Amit

More abstracts from these authors:
Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Compared to Aspirin for Secondary Prevention of Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Varkey Thomas, Restrepo Natalia, Koppanatham Aishwarya, Chochol Pawel, Rizwan Ahmed Aisha, Alexandrov Andrei

An Evaluation of Vascular Neurology Fellowship Websites: How Informed an Applicant Could Be?

Sivakumar Milan, Degen Nathaniel, Varkey Thomas, Alexandrov Andrei, Singh Savdeep

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)