Abstract Body: Objectives
We evaluate the potential link between post-acute care, particularly care provided at inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) (vs. home discharge or discharge to a skilled nursing facility [SNF]), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among ICH survivors.

Methods
Using inpatient and emergency department data from Florida, New York, Maryland, Washington, and Georgia, we identified adult (≥18 years) spontaneous ICH survivors discharged to home (with or without home health), IRF, or SNF between April 2016 and December 2018. We fit multivariable logistic regression models and report the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the independent association of discharge disposition (IRF versus home, and IRF versus SNF) with MACE (a composite outcome of stroke, acute myocardial infarction [AMI], systemic embolism, or vascular death), recurrent primary ICH [rICH], acute ischemic stroke (AIS), AMI, and all-cause mortality within 1-year of initial ICH admission. We assessed for interaction between age and discharge disposition and performed stratified analysis among patients aged < 65 years and older patients ≥ 65 years.

Results
A total of 17 647 ICH patients alive at discharge (median age [IQR]: 69[57-79]; 45.2% female; 55.5% non-Hispanic White; 23.2% non-Hispanic Black; 10.4% Hispanic; 4.9% Asian) were included, of which 8 194(46.4%), 4 506 (25.5%), and 4 947(28%) were discharged to home, IRF, and SNF, respectively. Within 1-year of follow-up, 7.4% of ICH survivors experienced MACE, while 2.5%, 3.2%, 0.6%, and 3.5%, respectively, experienced rICH, AIS, AMI, and mortality. Overall, patients discharged to IRF had lower odds of MACE (vs. home [aOR, CI: 0.79, 0.68-0.92]; vs. SNF [0.82, 0.70-0.97]; Table 1), rICH (vs. home [0.68, 0.52-0.89]; and vs. SNF [0.66, 0.49-0.88]), AMI (vs. home [0.57, 0.35-0.94]) and mortality (vs. SNF [0.57, 0.45-0.72]). A significant interaction between age and discharge destination was observed (P<0.01) for MACE. Patients <65 years had a similar pattern of associations as the combined data but among those aged ≥ 65 years, IRF discharge was only associated with lower mortality (vs SNF: 0.63, 0.48-0.81).

Conclusions
Post-acute care at an IRF (vs. home or SNF discharge) was associated with lower rates of MACE and recurrent ICH; however, this protective effect was not significant in patients ≥ 65 years. Specific aspects of IRF care driving better vascular outcomes need further evaluation.