Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: WP90

Cost of Stroke Treatment: A Comparative Analysis of Mobile Stroke and Standard Treatment

Abstract Body: Introduction: Over the past decade, Mobile Stroke Treatment Units (MSTU) have enhanced the quality of stroke care in the United States by bringing the hospital to the patient. While MSTUs improve stroke patient outcomes compared to standard hospital care, there are still limited units operating. The implementation of a MSTU requires considerable initial and long-term investment limiting their widespread programmatic formation. We evaluated a MSTU program in Florida between August 2023 and April 2024 for comparative patient associated out of pocket costs with MSTU and standard stroke care.

Methods: A discrete time Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) model was used to estimate incremental cost-savings associated with MSTU treatment compared to standard hospital care. The Markov model captured treatment costs for the care of patients at two functional levels as defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The potential cost-savings was determined by comparing the estimated costs incurred by the MSTU cohort to a counterfactual scenario of standard care of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) transport to the Emergency Department (ED). Since the model focused on the cost of patient care, costs included only billed ED, inpatient, and outpatient hospital care and services provided in the baseline year and then estimated cost of care over the next four years. All values represent 2024 dollars ($) and a 3% discount rate was applied to years two through four.

Results: The MSTU treated 59 acute stroke patients with an average age of 71.86 (SD=13.78). Overall, 76% (N=45) were diagnosed with ischemic stroke, 9% with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and 15% with transient ischemic attack (TIA). At discharge, 54% were independent and 46% dependent. In Year 1 (baseline), out of pocket cost differential between MSTU patients and the standard care was estimated to be $5,306 and $6,485 for the independent and dependent patients respectively. Projected future cost differentials in Years 2 to 4 were $4,571, $3,845, and $2,817 for the independent functioning cohort and $5,586, $4,700, and $4,188 for the dependent functioning cohort.

Conclusion: These results suggest that the out of pocket cost for MSTU patients was significantly lower than standard care both at baseline and over the first four years post-stroke, making MSTU acute stroke management a better economic system of care for time metrics, long term patient outcomes, and cost effectiveness.
  • Davis, Nicolle  ( UF Health Shands Hospital , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Lykens, David  ( UF Health Shands Hospital , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Khanna, Anna  ( UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Jacobs, Molly  ( UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA , Gainesville , Florida , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Nicolle Davis: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | David Lykens: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Anna Khanna: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Molly Jacobs: No Answer
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Cerebrovascular Systems of Care Posters I

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 07:00PM - 07:30PM

Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A machine learning approach to classifying ischemic stroke etiology using variables available in the Get-with-the-Guidelines Stroke Registry

Lee Ho-joon, Schwamm Lee, Turner Ashby, De Havenon Adam, Kamel Hooman, Brandt Cynthia, Zhao Hongyu, Krumholz Harlan, Sharma Richa

A Case Series of Papillary Fibroelastomas on the Coumadin ridge

Aboukhatwa Omar, Akiki Elias, Kurmann Reto, Larson Kathryn, Keeney Michael, Bois Melanie, Klarich Kyle

More abstracts from these authors:
Evaluation of Missed Strokes on Scene by a Mobile Stroke Treatment Unit

Davis Nicolle, Lykens David, Lavender Lauren, Fayed Mahmoud, Singh Amita, Peng Teng, Khanna Anna

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)