Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: 53

Risk of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Among Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Left Ventricular Dysfunction Defined by Left Ventricular Fractional Shortening: A Secondary Analysis of the ARCADIA Trial

Abstract Body: BACKGROUND: Nearly one-quarter of ischemic strokes (IS) in the U.S. are recurrent. The purpose of this study is to determine the risk of recurrent IS associated with left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), a measure of LV dysfunction, in patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy enrolled in the ARCADIA trial.

METHODS: We performed a post-hoc exploratory analysis in the ARCADIA trial, a phase III RCT of 1,015 cryptogenic stroke patients with atrial cardiopathy from February 2018 to February 2023. Those with LV ejection fraction <30% were not eligible. We dichotomized patients by LVFS <25% (reduced) and >25% (preserved). We built adjusted Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of recurrent IS within each LVFS strata by treatment strategy of apixaban versus aspirin. We evaluated for heterogeneity of treatment effect by LVFS strata, assessing the statistical significance of the interaction term in the model with adjustment for imbalanced covariates.

RESULTS: The analytic cohort comprised 944 participants, with reduced LVFS in 128 (13.6%) and preserved in 816 (86.4%). Patients with reduced LVFS were significantly more likely to be male (56.2% vs 43.8%, p= 0.009), have higher rates of coronary artery disease (23.4% vs 8.1%, p<0.001) and CHF (18.8% vs 5.2%, p<0.001), higher N-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (median 376 vs 291 pg/mL, p<0.001), lower P-wave terminal force in V1 (median 4063 vs 5225 microVolts x ms, p=0.035), and larger left atrial diameter index (median 2.0 vs 1.9 cm, p=0.028). Recurrent IS occurred in 12 (9.4%) and 57 (7.0%) participants with reduced versus preserved LVFS, respectively. There was an interaction between treatment effect and LVFS strata (p=0.03; Figure). In the adjusted analysis, the risk of recurrent IS among patients with reduced LVFS randomized to apixaban vs aspirin was significantly reduced (HR 0.11, 95% C.I. 0.02-0.61), but there was no treatment effect in patients with preserved LVFS (HR 1.01 95% C.I. 0.59-1.73).

CONCLUSION: Apixaban, compared to aspirin, was associated with a reduction in risk of recurrent IS among patients with cryptogenic stroke, atrial cardiopathy, and reduced LVFS. Further study is needed to identify the optimal strategy to prevent recurrent stroke in cryptogenic ischemic stroke patients with LV dysfunction.
  • Sharma, Richa  ( Yale School of Medicine , Hamden , Connecticut , United States )
  • Merkler, Alexander  ( Feil Family Brain & Mind Res Inst , New York , New York , United States )
  • Nahab, Fadi  ( EMORY UNIVERSITY , Atlanta , Georgia , United States )
  • Jillella, Dinesh  ( Emory School of Medicine , Atlanta , Georgia , United States )
  • Zhang, Cenai  ( Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , New York , United States )
  • Elkind, Mitchell  ( Columbia University School of Medicine , New York , New York , United States )
  • Kamel, Hooman  ( Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , New York , United States )
  • Di Tullio, Marco  ( Columbia University School of Medicine , New York , New York , United States )
  • Kronmal, Richard  ( University of Washington , Seattle , Washington , United States )
  • Longstreth, W  ( Harborview Medical Center , Seattle , Washington , United States )
  • Tirschwell, David  ( HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTER , Seattle , Washington , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Richa Sharma: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Alexander Merkler: No Answer | Fadi Nahab: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Dinesh Jillella: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Cenai Zhang: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Mitchell Elkind: No Answer | Hooman Kamel: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Other (please indicate in the box next to the company name):Financial disclosures for Hooman Kamel: a PI role in the ARCADIA trial, which received in-kind study drug from the BMS-Pfizer Alliance for Eliquis and ancillary study support from Roche Diagnostics; a Deputy Editor role for JAMA Neurology; clinical trial steering/executive committee roles for the STROKE-AF (Medtronic), LIBREXIA-AF (Janssen), and LAAOS-4 (Boston Scientific) trials; consulting or endpoint adjudication committee roles for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk; and household ownership interests in TETMedical, Spectrum Plastics Group, and Ascential Technologies.:Active (exists now) | Marco Di Tullio: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Richard Kronmal: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | W Longstreth: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | David Tirschwell: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:AbbVie:Past (completed) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Abbott:Active (exists now)
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Risk Factors and Prevention Oral Abstracts II

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 02:00PM - 03:00PM

Oral Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Central Arterial Stiffness in Young Adults with Perinatal HIV Exposure

Urbina Elaine, Yu Wendy, Williams Paige, Sawyer George, Van Dyke Russell, Colan Steven, Lipshultz Steven

Classifying Left Ventricular Hypertrophy from ECG in Overall Population and Bundle Branch Blocks: Machine Learning Models are Superior to Published ECG Criteria

Debauge Ashley, Harvey Christopher, Gupta Amulya, Noheria Amit

More abstracts from these authors:
Risk of Recurrent Ischemic Stroke Among Patients with Cryptogenic Stroke and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction <50%: A Secondary Analysis of the ARCADIA Trial

Jillella Dinesh, Merkler Alexander, Nahab Fadi, Sharma Richa, Zhang Cenai, Elkind Mitchell, Kamel Hooman, Kronmal Richard, Longstreth W, Tirschwell David, Di Tullio Marco

Recurrent Strokes in the ARCADIA Trial

Tirschwell David, Elkind Mitchell, Kamel Hooman, Kronmal Richard, Longstreth W

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)