Logo

American Heart Association

  19
  0


Final ID:

Accuracy of cardiologist reporting of severe aortic stenosis and its impact on clinical management: Insights from decision-support artificial intelligence applied to 28,491 men and women undergoing echocardiography.

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): BACKGROUND: Despite established echocardiographic (echo) guidelines, under-reporting of severe AS is common and may delay management. We investigated whether echo measurement-based artificial intelligence (AI) without image recognition can enhance diagnostic accuracy and mitigate diagnostic delays.

METHODS: After excluding prior surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter (TAVI) aortic valve replacement (n=127), left ventricular outflow tract measurement errors (n=183) and a repeat study in the same year (n=2,144), 28,491 adults (mean age 65.02±16.56 years, 52.5% male) undergoing transthoracic echo (July 2022 to June 2023) were included. AI software was retrospectively applied to all echos, with outputs compared to cardiologist-reported AS severity, followed by prospective follow-up of severe cases. To verify AI accuracy, a random sample of cases were selected for blinded image review (two reviewers, with a third to break the tie if any discrepancy).

RESULTS: The AI returned low-probability (n=27,415, 96.1%), medium-probability (n=70, 0.2%), or high-probability (n=1006, 3.5%) of the severe AS phenotype. 784 (77.9%) high-probability cases met severe AS guidelines. Cardiologists reported no, mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe AS in 107 (10.6%), 19 (1.9%), 391 (38.9%), 154 (15.3%) and 335 (33.3%) cases, respectively, confirming under-reporting of severe AS. Randomized blinded image review reinforced this finding: Severe AS was reported as moderate or moderately severe in 67%, moderate AS reported as no or mild AS in 29%. 427 high-probability cases had outpatient cardiology follow-up: 92.5% mentioned AS severity, with conservative management in 51.8% and 80.1% of cardiologist-reported severe and non-severe AS, respectively. Females represented 47.9% of high probability cases, but only 38.4% were reported severe (vs men, 44.2%, p<0.001) despite a similar AVA (0.97±0.33 vs 0.95±0.27 cm2, p=ns) but lower AV gradients (28.0±14.2 vs 32.6±14.4 mmHg respectively, p<0.001). Among AI high-probability echos, a cardiologist report of non-severe AS was associated with a lower mean AV gradient, a higher AVA, lower stroke volume index, and a longer time to referral for SAVR or TAVI evaluation. Symptoms were common in both groups (see table).

CONCLUSIONS: Severe AS misclassification during echo reporting is common, causing management/intervention delays. AI shows significant promise in highlighting the severe AS phenotype, particularly for females and low-gradient AS.
  • Bhat, Vikas  ( University of Notre Dame , Fremantle , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Strange, Geoff  ( NEDA LTD , Perth , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Butcher, Steele  ( Advara Heart Care , Perth , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Deans, Renae  ( Advara Heart Care , Perth , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Mahoney, Thomas  ( Advara Heart Care , Perth , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Barnes, Cara  ( Advara Heart Care , Perth , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Playford, David  ( University of Notre Dame , Fremantle , Western Australia , Australia )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Vikas Bhat: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Geoff Strange: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Edwards Lifescience:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):AstraZeneca:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Novartis:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):NEDA:Active (exists now) ; Independent Contractor:Echo IQ:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Abbott Labratory:Past (completed) ; Speaker:Medtronic:Past (completed) | Steele Butcher: No Answer | Renae Deans: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Thomas Mahoney: No Answer | Cara Barnes: No Answer | David Playford: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Advisor:Echo IQ:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Pfizer:Expected (by end of conference) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):BMS:Past (completed) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):AstraZeneca:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Edwards:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Novartis:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):NEDA:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Echo IQ:Active (exists now)
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Trials and Deployments of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiology

Saturday, 11/08/2025 , 03:15PM - 04:30PM

Featured Science

More abstracts on this topic:
A Diagnostic Pitfall: Subclavian Stenosis Mimicking Severe Aortic Stenosis on Echocardiography"

Ezaldin Shady, Abdelsalam Mahmoud, Elsayed Omar, Lee Marciano

Acoustic Biomarkers Harvested from 911 Calls Differ among Patients with Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Chest Pain

Mazhar Harris, Zegre-hemsey Jessica, Lee Kyungbok, Tian Baotong, Heydari Mojtaba, Cushman Jeremy, Duan Zhiyao, Dzikowicz Dillon

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available