Logo

American Heart Association

  18
  0


Final ID: MP2139

Medicare utilization and reimbursement patterns of remote monitoring for hypertension across primary care, nephrology, and cardiology

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background:
Remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) codes are increasingly being used to manage hypertension. Internists commonly perform hypertension monitoring and RPM-related billing. However, it remains unclear to what extent various specialties like cardiology and nephrology utilize remote monitoring for hypertension and are reimbursed for these RPM services.

Hypothesis:
We hypothesized that cardiologists perform and bill more RPM services (for the three most common codes for remote monitoring of hypertension) but receive the same Medicare reimbursement per procedure as PCPs (Family Medicine and Internal Medicine) and nephrologists.

Methods:
We analyzed the 2023 Medicare Physician and Other Practitioners Public Use File, identifying utilization of 3 standard remote physiological monitoring CPT codes 99453 (Digitally Stored Data Services/Remote Physiologic Monitoring), 99454 (Digitally Stored Data Services/Remote Physiologic Monitoring), and 99457 (Remote Physiologic Monitoring Treatment Management Services). Providers looked at were Cardiologists, PCPs (internal and family medicine), and Nephrologists. We calculated the total, per-patient, and per-provider Medicare payments and services rendered. Inferential statistics included ANOVA comparing payments and service volumes between groups.

Results:
A total of 976 Cardiologists, 3,221 PCPs, and 401 Nephrologists submitted RPM-related claims. Cardiologists had the highest service volume per provider across all 3 CPT codes compared to internists or nephrologists.

Cardiologists had the highest average per-patient reimbursement ($196.15) compared to Nephrologists ($187.64) and PCPs ($171.27). Across all three CPT codes, significant differences were observed in both mean payment per service (p < 0.001) and service volume (p < 0.001). The most crucial discrepancy was observed for CPT 99454, where cardiologists averaged $239.07 per patient vs. $200.97 (PCPs) and $209.11 (Nephrologists), with all pairwise comparisons reaching statistical significance (p < 0.01). Nephrologists demonstrated intermediate utilization and reimbursement patterns for all RPM codes, substantially higher than PCPs but consistently lower than Cardiologists.

Conclusion:
Cardiologists are the predominant service providers for remote monitoring services and receive substantially higher Medicare reimbursement for their services.
  • Saroya, Jasmeet  ( UC Davis Medical Center , Sacramento , California , United States )
  • Atreja, Surabhi  ( UC Davis Medical Center , Sacramento , California , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Jasmeet Saroya: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | surabhi Atreja: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Using New Technologies in Hypertension Treatment

Monday, 11/10/2025 , 09:15AM - 10:10AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A Comparative Analysis of Social Demographic and Clinical Factors for Screening for Peripheral Artery Disease in Adult Patients from Primary Care Clinics

Lane Rashon, Jackson Pasha, Anokwuru Ferdinand, Dillard Naomi, Nerlekar Ridhima

Contemporary Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes of Patients With Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Multi-Center Analysis

Vemulapalli Sreekanth, Genereux Philippe, Lindman Brian, Elmariah Sammy, Pibarot Philippe, Peterson Benjamin, Rodriguez Evelio, Leon Martin, Mack Michael, Eberst Kyle

More abstracts from these authors:
Comprehensive Resistant Hypertension Clinic Improves Access to Care and Blood Pressure Control

Vardanyan Lilit, Atreja Surabhi, Yoon Karis, Martinez-puente Brenda, Zeb Suhail, Acosta Milan, Ta Brian, Lwin Yee May, Lee Vivian, Sobol Tim

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available