Co-existence And Prognosis of 18FDG-avidity And Genetic Cardiomyopathies
Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction: 18FDG-PET scan has emerged as a modality for identifying inflammatory cardiomyopathies such as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) by detecting glucose uptake. Guidelines allow for diagnosis of CS based on clinical presentation and 18FDG-avidity without requiring tissue biopsy. However, patients with genetic cardiomyopathies can be 18FDG-avid, potentially leading to misdiagnosis as isolated CS. Objectives: To evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic and likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in 18FDG-avid cardiomyopathy and assess the association between FDG-avidity, genetic variants, and heart failure outcomes. Methods: A multi-center retrospective cohort study combined patients from three centers who underwent both a cardiac 18FDG-PET scan and commercial genetic testing for genetic cardiomyopathies. We excluded patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis, as well as those with incomplete 18FDG suppression. Chi-square tests were used to compare between group characteristics, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to evaluate time to event outcomes, including a composite of death, LVAD implantation, or heart transplant, based on 18FDG-avidity and genetic status. Results: Among 459 patients who underwent both a cardiac 18FDG-PET scan and genetic testing, 389 (33% female; mean age 54 years) met the inclusion criteria. 18FDG-avidity was identified in 158 (40%). Within this subgroup, 19 (12%) had a P/LP variant compared with 19% of the 18FDG-negative patients (p=0.051; Figure 1). Baseline characteristics were similar, and a wide array of genes was implicated in 18FDG-avid cardiomyopathy (Figure 2). Survival analysis revealed no significant difference between the four genotype-FDG subgroups (p=0.13, Figure 3), and 18FDG-avidity was not significantly associated with the composite endpoint in the overall cohort (p=0.35), nor within the subset of patients with P/LP variants (p=0.84), suggesting that 18FDG-avidity did not predict clinical outcomes. The presence of a P/LP variant was associated with an increased incidence of the composite endpoint (p=0.047). Conclusion: 18FDG-avidity is frequently noted in patients with genetic cardiomyopathy, but was not associated with adverse clinical outcomes, suggesting it may not reflect clinically relevant inflammation. P/LP variants were significantly associated with survival outcomes, highlighting the value of genetic testing in patients with suspected inflammatory cardiomyopathy.
Tabaghi, Shiva
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Bevan, Graham
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Hankinson, Stephen
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Lal, Mallika
(
Oregon Health & Science University
, Portland , Oregon , United States )
Pico, Madison
(
Oregon Health & Science University
, Portland , Oregon , United States )
Lakdawala, Neal
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Sauer, William
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Tedrow, Usha
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Blankstein, Ron
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Di Carli, Marcelo
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Chatterjee, Neal
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Cheng, Richard
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Stempien-otero, April
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Levin, Benjamin
(
Oregon Health & Science University
, Portland , Oregon , United States )
Divakaran, Sanjay
(
Brigham and Women's Hospital
, Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
Nazer, Babak
(
University of Washington
, Seattle , Washington , United States )
Author Disclosures:
Shiva Tabaghi:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| MARCELO DI CARLI:No Answer
| Neal Chatterjee:No Answer
| Richard Cheng:No Answer
| April Stempien-Otero:No Answer
| Benjamin Levin:No Answer
| Sanjay Divakaran:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Babak Nazer:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Graham Bevan:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Stephen Hankinson:No Answer
| Mallika Lal:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Madison Pico:No Answer
| Neal Lakdawala:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Consultant:BMS:Active (exists now)
; Advisor:Neuvocore:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Gemma:Active (exists now)
; Advisor:Kardigan:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Tenaya:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Cytokinetics:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Pfizer:Past (completed)
; Consultant:Alexion:Active (exists now)
| William Sauer:No Answer
| Usha Tedrow:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Speaker:Biosense Webster:Past (completed)
; Speaker:Abbott Medical:Past (completed)
; Advisor:Boston Scientific:Past (completed)
| Ron Blankstein:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Consultant:Heartflow:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Nanox AI:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Heartflow:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Amgen:Active (exists now)
; Researcher:Novartis Inc:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Siemens Inc:Past (completed)
; Consultant:Caristo:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Nanox AI:Active (exists now)