Logo

American Heart Association

  17
  0


Final ID: Su3037

Neonatal Resource Utilization following False Positive Prenatal Diagnosis of Coarctation of the Aorta

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction: Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta (COA) is challenging and associated with high false positive rates. Postnatal confirmation of the diagnosis is frequently not possible until after closure of the ductus arteriosus, often days after birth. During this period, neonates with prenatal diagnosis of COA undergo an ‘arch watch,’ which may include invasive procedures, laboratory draws, and repeated imaging studies. Historically, over half of these neonates are deemed to have no heart disease.

Hypothesis: We sought to characterize the clinical implications of prenatal overdiagnosis of COA. We hypothesized that newborns with false positive prenatal diagnosis of COA undergo increased testing and extended hospitalizations after birth.

Methods: Term neonates with prenatal diagnosis of COA +/- ventricular septal defect born at our quaternary care center between 2005 and 2024 were identified in the electronic medical record. Patients were excluded if they had more complex heart disease, extracardiac anomalies, or known genetic abnormalities. Data were collected from the time of maternal fetal cardiology consultation through neonatal cardiac repair or hospital discharge if repair was not required. Descriptive statistics were performed and reported as n (%) and median (Q1,Q3).

Results: Of 107 term neonates identified who underwent an arch watch, 72 (67%) did not require surgery. Among those not requiring repair, median length of stay was 3 days (2, 7). Twenty-six neonates (36%) had ≥3 echocardiograms, median time to first echocardiogram was 1 hour (1,2), and the ductus arteriosus was more than moderate in size on the first study in 40 neonates (56%). Twenty-four neonates (33%) had umbilical lines placed, 39 (54%) had X-rays, 35 (49%) had non-routine laboratory workup in the first 12 hours of life, and 45 (62.5%) had genetic testing.

Conclusions: The majority of newborns who underwent an arch watch did not require COA surgery, yet they were subjected to cascading neonatal cardiac critical care including umbilical line placement, multiple echocardiograms, and laboratory and radiographic testing. Our study reveals that the majority of infants who underwent a negative arch watch had genetic testing performed. More tailored perinatal care, with risk-stratified pathways incorporating delay of potentially risky procedures until confirmation of diagnosis, may reduce the clinical burden on patients who are eventually cleared of the prenatal diagnosis of COA.
  • Littlejohn, Sam  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Sherwin, Jennifer  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Edwards, Lindsay  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Carmon, Philip  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Smith, Margaret Anne  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Barker, Piers  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Boyd, Brita  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Izatt, Susan  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Li, Jennifer  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Miller, Stephen  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Sethi, Neeta  ( Duke University Medical Center , Durham , North Carolina , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Sam Littlejohn: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Jennifer Sherwin: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Advisor:Alta-Thera Pharmaceuticals:Past (completed) | Lindsay Edwards: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Philip Carmon: No Answer | Margaret Anne Smith: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Piers Barker: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Brita Boyd: No Answer | Susan Izatt: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Jennifer Li: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Stephen Miller: No Answer | Neeta Sethi: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Potpourri 1: Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology

Sunday, 11/09/2025 , 11:30AM - 12:30PM

Abstract Poster Board Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A Pressure-Volume Loops Approach Predicts Outcomes After Double Switch Operation For Congenitally Corrected Transposition Of The Great Arteries with Intact Ventricular Septum

Thatte Nikhil, Del Nido Pedro, Ghelani Sunil, Hammer Peter, Marx Gerald, Beroukhim Rebecca, Gauvreau Kimberlee, Callahan Ryan, Prakash Ashwin, Emani Sitaram, Hoganson David

Successful Right Subclavian Impella Placement in a Patient with Coarctation of the Aorta and Small Femoral Arteries: A Novel Access Approach for Mechanical Circulatory Support

Reaz Shams, Almorsy Khaled, Pitasari Josephine, Munir Ahmad

More abstracts from these authors:
High Incidence of Adverse Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnancy in Women with Congenital Heart Disease

Edwards Lindsay, Raskind-hood Cheryl, Book Wendy, Feldkamp Marcia, Li Jennifer, Botto Lorenzo, Goldstein Sarah, Nilles Ester, Chiswell Karen, Dottavio Alfred, Reeder Matthew, Glidewell Jill, Wood Kathleen, Sethi Neeta

Leveraging machine learning for rheumatic heart disease in low resource settings

Edwards Lindsay, Manlhiot Cedric

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available