Logo

American Heart Association

  24
  0


Final ID: MP1932

Favorable Outcomes with Preoperative Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in Emergent Pulmonary Embolectomy for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a last-resort therapy for patients with hemodynamic instability due to acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Some of these patients require emergent pulmonary embolectomy. However, the impact of preoperative ECMO support on surgical outcomes remains unclear.
Research Question:
Does preoperative ECMO support have a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of pulmonary embolectomy?
Methods:
Between December 2007 and February 2025, 37 patients underwent emergent pulmonary embolectomy for acute PE. ECMO support was initiated in patients who experienced cardiac arrest (CPA), persistent hemodynamic shock, or unstable circulatory status. Patients were divided into two groups: those who did not receive ECMO (Group A, n=17) and those who did (Group B, n=20). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and CPA requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following induction of anesthesia. Preoperative characteristics, early surgical outcomes, and late survival were compared between the two groups. Late survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method.
Results:
No significant differences were observed between groups regarding age (Group A: 58.5 ± 16.0 years; Group B: 58.7 ± 15.0 years; p=0.98), male (Group A: 9; Group B: 15; p=0.16), or body weight (Group A: 62.3 ± 14.6 kg; Group B: 71.9 ± 15.7 kg; p=0.063). All patients underwent surgery via median sternotomy. Operation time was not significantly different between two groups (Group A: 190.1 ± 71.3 minutes; Group B: 228.4 ± 65.2 minutes; p=0.10). In Group A, two patients experienced CPA requiring CPR following induction of anesthesia. One of these patients suffered hypoxic brain injury and subsequently died during hospitalization. Two other patients died during hospitalization. In contrast, none in Group B experienced the primary outcome (Group A: 4 patients; Group B: 0 patients; p=0.036). The mean follow up period after discharge was 46.5 ± 43.2 months. The 5-year freedom from all-cause mortality was significantly lower in Group A (59.7%) compared to Group B (94.1%) (log rank=0.013).
Conclusion:
Preoperative ECMO support did not worsen clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergent pulmonary embolectomy for acute PE. On the contrary, it may prevent hemodynamic collapse during anesthesia induction. Aggressive consideration of ECMO support prior to emergent surgery might be warranted in hemodynamically unstable patients.
  • Nishida, Hidefumi  ( St.Luke's International hospital , Tokyo , Japan )
  • Nakamura, Ryota  ( St.Luke's International hospital , Tokyo , Japan )
  • Tamaki, Rihito  ( St.Luke's International hospital , Tokyo , Japan )
  • Abe, Kohei  ( St.Luke's International hospital , Tokyo , Japan )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Hidefumi Nishida: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Ryota Nakamura: No Answer | Rihito Tamaki: No Answer | Kohei Abe: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Pressure Points: PH, PE, and RV Failure After LVAD

Monday, 11/10/2025 , 09:15AM - 10:15AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Age- and Sex- Differences in the Accuracy of Rule-based Natural Language Processing Models for Identification of Pulmonary Embolism

Krishnathasan Darsiya, Jimenez David, Monreal Manuel, Secemsky Eric, Klok Erik, Hunsaker Andetta, Aghayev Ayaz, Muriel Alfonso, Hussain Mohamad, Appah-sampong Abena, Aneja Sanjay, Rashedi Sina, Mojibian Hamid, Goldhaber Samuel, Wang Liqin, Zhou Li, Krumholz Harlan, Piazza Gregory, Bikdeli Behnood, Khairani Candrika, Bejjani Antoine, Lo Ying-chih, Zarghami Mehrdad, Mahajan Shiwani, Caraballo Cesar, Jimenez Ceja Jose Victor

A Case Report: Outpatient Diagnosis of Venous Stent Migration - Avoiding Catastrophic Outcomes

Basnyat Anouksha, Pamganamamula Madhu, Naidu Raja, Pamganamamula Teja, Manchiraju Srinidhi, Gaddam Srilakshmi, Panganamamula Lalitha

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available