The Clinical and Electrocardiographic Phenotype of Genotype Negative Long QT Syndrome
Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: LQTS is a genetic heart disease associated with an increased risk of sudden death. Despite advances in genetic testing, a small subset of patients still lacks identifiable genetic markers. Consequently, the true prevalence and clinical phenotype of genotype negative remains to be determined. Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS but a negative genetic test. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients evaluated and treated at a tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2024, focusing on those with a clinical diagnosis of LQTS, but a negative genetic test for all LQTS-associated genes, with available follow-up of at least 1 year. Results: After exclusion for follow-up and lack of genetic testing, the study cohort consisted of 1834 patients with LQTS including 1708 (93%) with a (likely) pathogenic (LP/P), LQTS-causative variant. Also, in 95 patients (5%), their variant of uncertain significance was clinically upgraded to a LP/P-variant, leaving only 31 patients classified as phenotype positive but genotype negative (1.6%). Of these, 16/31 underwent next-generation genetic sequencing, revealing the genetic cause in 6/16 cases (37%; 0.3% of all patients). For the remaining 25 genotype negative LQTS patients (1.3%), the mean age at diagnosis was 26 ± 15 years, with 19 (76%) being female, and an average initial QTc of 497 ± 41 ms. In total, 11 patients (44%) experienced a cardiac event before diagnosis [1 sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), 1 Torsades, 1 VT, 8 syncopes] and 1 patient had his first cardiac event during follow-up; 7/12 patients had more than one subsequent event. Twenty patients were proband (80%) and 6 had a family history of SCA. Eleven patients received an ICD (44%), left cardiac sympathetic denervation was performed in 4 (16%), and 2 patients experienced arrhythmia-related deaths (8%). The mean follow-up since diagnosis was 7 ± 5 years. Conclusion: With a prevalence of genotype-negative LQTS of 2%, the number of these patients is much lower than previously suggested, underscoring the advancements in identifying new genetic markers and the role of phenotype-enhanced variant adjudication and next-generation sequencing. Additionally, significant disease severity was observed in the remaining patients, emphasizing the pivotal role of genotype-phenotype correlations and risk stratification in managing and counseling patients lacking identified LQTS-causing mutations.
Karlinski Vizentin, Vanessa
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Neves, Raquel
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Bains, Sahej
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Ferreira Felix, Iuri
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Bos, Johan
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Tester, David
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Giudicessi, John
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Ackerman, Michael
( Mayo Clinic
, Rochester
, Minnesota
, United States
)
Author Disclosures:
Vanessa Karlinski Vizentin:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Raquel Neves:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Sahej Bains:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Iuri Ferreira Felix:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| Johan Bos:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| David Tester:DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
| John Giudicessi:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Consultant:Avidity Biosciences:Active (exists now)
; Other (please indicate in the box next to the company name):Prolaio (equity/royalty sharing):Active (exists now)
; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Tenaya Therapeutics:Active (exists now)
| Michael Ackerman:DO have relevant financial relationships
;
Consultant:Abbott:Active (exists now)
; Royalties/Patent Beneficiary:Thryv Therapeutics:Active (exists now)
; Royalties/Patent Beneficiary:Pfizer:Past (completed)
; Royalties/Patent Beneficiary:ARMGO Pharma:Active (exists now)
; Royalties/Patent Beneficiary:Anumana:Active (exists now)
; Royalties/Patent Beneficiary:AliveCor:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Tenaya Therapeutics:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Solid Biosciences:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Medtronic:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Invitae:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Illumina:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Daiichi Sankyo:Past (completed)
; Consultant:Bristol Myers Squibb:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:Boston Scientific:Active (exists now)
; Consultant:BioMarin Pharmaceutical:Active (exists now)