Logo

American Heart Association

  96
  0


Final ID: MDP259

Pulsed field ablation of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after prior thermal ablations

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to thermal ablation modalities for treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF in a de novo procedure.
Research Questions: Since the FaraPulse system (Boston Scientific) was approved by FDA, no data was reported on whether PFA can be used in redo procedures.
Aims: We reported our initial experience with PFA in patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) who failed at least one thermal ablation of AF.
Methods: Consecutive patients receiving redo ablation using PFA (FaraPulse) for recurrent ATs were enrolled. ICE and fluoroscopy were used to guide the placement of FaraWave catheter. Voltage and activation mapping of LA were performed in all patients before ablation using Orion high density mapping catheter and Rhythmia system. Ablation strategy included PV re-isolation as needed, LA posterior wall (PW) isolation if low voltage zone was identified, and ablation of any organized ATs. Procedural endpoints were PVs and LAPW isolation, non-inducibility for ATs and bidirectional block for linear ablation.
Results: 15 patients (12 male; age 66.3±10.3 years) were included. The median number of prior RF ablations was 2; 2 patients also received one cryoballoon ablation. Patients presented with persistent (80%) AF or paroxysmal (20%) AF with/without documented organized ATs. By using PFA, LAPW isolation was performed and achieved in all patients, while 11 (73.3%) patients required reisolation of at least one PV (Figure). Organized ATs were present/induced in 7 (46.7%) patients including 3 peri-mitral AFL, 3 LA roof-dependent AFL, 3 CTI AFL and 3 atrial tachycardias from LA roof, LA septum and RA roof respectively. RF ablation was required in 2 patients (2/7, 28.5%) to eliminate CTI AFL. Per case total PFA applications number were 48.7±24.4 (46, 22-90); total fluoroscopy time was 6.8±5.6 mins. No major peri-procedural complication was observed except for one case (90 PFA applications) of hemolysis and acute renal failure that completely recovered.
Conclusion: PFA of recurrent ATs after failed thermal ablation is feasible and safe acutely if limited the applications. The long-term outcome of this strategy warrants further investigation.
  • Bai, Rong  ( Banner Univ. Medical Center PHOENIX , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Tung, Roderick  ( University of Arizona- Phoenix , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Su, Wilber  ( Banner University Medical Center , Paradise Valley , Arizona , United States )
  • Shen, Caijie  ( The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University , Ningbo , Zhejiang , China )
  • Chou, Tsai-lin  ( Boston Scientific Corporation , Pheonix , Arizona , United States )
  • Eng, Mischa  ( Grosse Pointe South High School , Grosse Pointe Farms , Michigan , United States )
  • Dai, Yi  ( University of Arizona , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Martinez, Jake  ( Banner Univ. Medical Center PHOENIX , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Katrapati, Praneeth  ( Banner University Medical Center Phoenix , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Zawaneh, Michael  ( Banner University Medical Center , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Weiss, Peter  ( Banner Univ. Medical Center PHOENIX , Phoenix , Arizona , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Rong Bai: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Roderick Tung: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Speaker:Medtronic:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Atricure:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Abbott:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Biosense Webster:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Biotronik:Past (completed) ; Speaker:Boston Scientific:Active (exists now) | Wilber Su: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Boston Scientific:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Synaptic Medical:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Synaptic Medical :Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Medtronic:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Boston Scientific :Active (exists now) | Caijie Shen: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Tsai-Lin Chou: No Answer | Mischa Eng: No Answer | Yi Dai: No Answer | Jake Martinez: No Answer | Praneeth Katrapati: No Answer | Michael Zawaneh: No Answer | Peter Weiss: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2024

2024

Chicago, Illinois

Session Info:

Pulsed Field Ablation Part Deux!

Saturday, 11/16/2024 , 09:30AM - 10:55AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:

A Large Animal Model of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Mostafizi Pouria, Goldman Steven, Moukabary Talal, Lefkowitz Eli, Ref Jacob, Daugherty Sherry, Grijalva Adrian, Cook Kyle Eric, Chinyere Ike, Lancaster Jordan, Koevary Jen

A Comparative Analysis of Esophageal Cooling for Preventing Esophageal Injury Post Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ibrahim Momen Mohamed, Al Hennawi Hussam, Tanas Yousef, Abourady Youmna, Sewedan Nourhan, Hashem Ahmed Magdy, Motawea Karam R.

More abstracts from these authors:
When and which patient to use PFA for VT ablation

Turagam Mohit, Koruth Jacob, Tung Roderick

His Bundle Pacing for Patients with HFrEF and Right Bundle Branch Block

Kutyifa Valentina, Tung Roderick, Ellenbogen Kenneth

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available