Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) has emerged as useful to assess subclinical myocardial dysfunction, however its utility in diabetes milletus (DM) has been limited to the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal systolic function.
Aim: To assess the differences and prognostic implications of left (LV) and right (RV)ventricular systolic and diastolic strain parameters in DM.
Methods: Of the initial 1721 DM patients screened for this study only 513 consecutive patients with DM were eligible and retrospectively enrolled, and 2D-STE strain (longitudinal, circumferential and radial) parameters assessed on the 2D-TTE images. All patients were prospectively followed for development of new outcome/cardiac events which included hospitalization for acute HF, CVS-related death, heart transplantation, and also diabetic complications. The 2D-STE analysis was used to measure the peak LV (longitudinal, radial and circumferential) and RV (longitudinal and radial) strain parameters. The long-term outcomes were evaluated for all-cause CVS outcomes and recurrent hospitalization.

Results: For the 513 eligible patients [mean age: 51±8; 62 % male sex], 263 reached the combined endpoint during a mean follow-up of 1.4±0.6years. Conventional TTE was performed in all subjects and reviewed. Both LV and RV strain parameters were significantly impaired compared to normal standard references (p<.0001), where RV was more impaired than LV strain parameters. The best performance parameters predictive of CVS events were RV systolic and diastolic strain than global LV longitudinal systolic and diastolic strain. The strongest association between the degree of myocardial dysfunction and CVS risk was more evident for RV strain (free wall > global strain) and lesser extend to LV strain. More myocardial strain impairments were demonstrated in those with higher left atrial volume index, impaired diastolic function, lower strain values ( LV, RV), and reduced tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, p<.001). RV strain and to a lesser extend LV strain impairment were independent predictors of combined outcomes after multiple adjustments using different models.
Conclusion: Patients with Diabetes, RV and LV strain parameters are stronger (RV>LV strain) predictors of outcome than other conventional parameters and should be included for regular clinical screening DM patients as these parameters provide a stronger prognostic stratification