Logo

American Heart Association

  2
  0


Final ID: MDP575

Temporal Trends and Predictors of Cardiac Biomarker Testing in the Emergency Department, 2014-2021

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background
Presenting symptoms risk stratify patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) to determine their likelihood of having a myocardial infarction (MI) and need for cardiac biomarker testing. Since the 2014 AHA/ACC non-ST segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) guideline, little is known regarding cardiac biomarker testing trends in the United States.

Methods
We analyzed data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey for consecutive adult ED visits between 2014 and 2021 in the United States. The primary outcome was the proportion of ED visits where cardiac biomarker testing occurred. Subgroup analysis was performed for visits with chest pain, non-chest pain anginal equivalents, and non-anginal symptoms. Survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) to assess predictors of cardiac biomarker utilization.

Results
In total, 87,965 ED visits were sampled, representing a weighted total of 644,531,395 visits. Cardiac biomarker testing occurred in 7.21% of all ED visits (95% CI, 6.27%-8.29%) and increased over time (Figure, P=0.03 for trend). When stratified by symptoms, utilization of testing mainly increased among patients with non-chest pain anginal equivalents (Figure, P=0.02 for trend). Cardiac biomarker testing was most frequently used for patients with chest pain (34.9%) and non-chest pain anginal equivalents (39.3%). Nonetheless, 25.8% of patients who underwent testing had no chest pain or anginal equivalents. Cardiac biomarker testing was more frequent among patients with older age (aOR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.04), tachycardia (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41), tachypnea (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.47-1.98), history of heart failure (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.15-1.54), prior venous thromboembolism (aOR 1.43, 95% CI 1.12-1.83), and those treated in a rural setting (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.14-2.32).

Conclusion
Cardiac biomarker testing in the ED has increased over time, mostly attributed to increased utilization among patients with a low pre-test probability of MI. Notably, 25% of individuals who underwent cardiac biomarker testing had no chest pain or anginal-equivalent symptoms. More judicious utilization of cardiac biomarker testing may be needed.
  • Watson, Nathan  ( Harvard Medical School , Boston , Washington , United States )
  • Wasfy, Jason  ( Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Baugh, Christopher  ( Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Januzzi, James  ( Massachusetts General Hospital , Wellesley Hills , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Secemsky, Eric  ( Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Mccarthy, Cian  ( Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Nathan Watson: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Jason Wasfy: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Christopher Baugh: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Abbott Laboratories:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:UltraSight:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Octapharma:Past (completed) ; Advisor:Salix Pharmaceuticals:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Pfizer Inc:Active (exists now) ; Advisor:AstraZeneca:Active (exists now) ; Research Funding (PI or named investigator):Abbott Laboratories:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Roche Diagnostics:Active (exists now) | James Januzzi: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Researcher:Abbott:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Prevencio:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Quidel:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Roche Diagnostics:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:AstraZeneca:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Boehringer Ingelheim:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Beckman:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Abbott:Active (exists now) ; Individual Stocks/Stock Options:Jana Care:Active (exists now) ; Individual Stocks/Stock Options:Imbria:Active (exists now) ; Researcher:Novartis:Active (exists now) ; Researcher:Applied Therapeutics:Active (exists now) ; Researcher:BMS:Active (exists now) ; Researcher:AstraZeneca:Active (exists now) | Eric Secemsky: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Abbott/CSI, BD, BMS, Boston Scientific, Cagent, Conavi, Cook, Cordis, Endovascular Engineering, Gore, InfraRedx, Medtronic, Philips, RapidAI, Rampart, Shockwave, Terumo, Thrombolex, VentureMed, Zoll:Active (exists now) | Cian McCarthy: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Roche Diagnostics:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Abbott Laboratories:Past (completed)
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2024

2024

Chicago, Illinois

Session Info:

Biomarkers in ACS

Saturday, 11/16/2024 , 09:30AM - 10:55AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Insights from the All of Us Research Program

Renedo Daniela, Schwamm Lee, Kamel Hooman, Matouk Charles, Tal Reshef, Sheth Kevin, Falcone Guido, Chaves-rivera Maria Natalia, Rivier Cyprien, Koo Andrew, Clocchiatti-tuozzo Santiago, Huo Shufan, Sujijantarat Nanthiya, Torres Lopez Victor, Hebert Ryan

Aggressive LDL cholesterol lowering post ACS with triple combination therapy: Insights from the multicentric LAI-REACT study

Puri Raman, Mahajan Kunal, Agarwala Rajeev, Gupta Ashu, Batra Aditya, Khan Aziz, Vijan Vinod, Sharma Jai Bharat, Himral Surender

More abstracts from these authors:
Risk Scores and Hypertension Management

Mccarthy Cian

National Estimates of Patient Eligibility for Renal Denervation Therapy Post-FDA Approval

Watson Nathan, Earle William, Kandzari David, Kirtane Ajay, Mahfoud Felix, Cluett Jennifer, Krawisz Anna, Juraschek Stephen, Secemsky Eric

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available