Abstract Body: Background: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of public assistance on patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in Japan.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from the SAVE-J II study, a retrospective, multicenter registry study involving 36 participating institutions in Japan. Patients with cardiac arrest who received ECPR were divided into two groups depending on whether or not they had received public assistance. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes were as follows: 30-day favorable neurological outcomes (cerebral performance category scores 1-2); survival at discharge; favorable neurological outcome at discharge; number of intensive care unit, hospital, ventilator, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation days; medical expenses; proportion of percutaneous coronary intervention; target temperature management; mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use; and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
Results: Of 2,157 patients registered in the SAVE-J II study, 1,885 patients were enrolled in this study; 99 patients (5.3%) received public assistance and 1,786 patients (94.7%) did not. Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not show a significant difference in 30-day survival (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.77-1.95, p=0.40). The log-rank test for the Kaplan-Meiercurve on 30-day survival did not demonstrate a significant difference (p=0.46). Except for the use of MCS devices, there were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.
Conclusions: The use of public assistance did not influence the prognoses of OHCA patients receiving ECPR. Treatment option during hospitalization may be affected by the use of public assistance.