Logo

American Heart Association

  8
  0


Final ID: LB22

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Treated by Reperfusion Therapy – a randomized trial

Abstract Body: Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) demonstrated neuroprotective effects in animal stroke models. We aimed to determine the safety and signals for efficacy of semaglutide, a GLP-1RA, in patients with acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT).
Methods: In a phase 2 investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial conducted at four hospitals in China, adult patients with disabling LVO who presented within 12 hours of last-known-well were randomized into semaglutide (0.5mg before and 1 week after EVT) or standard therapy. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was administered if indicated. Primary safety outcome was a composite of death, malignant brain edema, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Primary efficacy outcome was favourable neurological recovery (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2 at 90 days). Intention-to-treat analysis was performed adjusting for age, premorbid mRS, IVT use, stroke severity on presentation, last-known-well-to-puncture time, modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score.
Results: Between August 2023, and July 2024, 140 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to semaglutide (n=69) or standard therapy (n=71). Mean age of patients was 68.2±10.9 years, 46 (32.9%) were female. Primary safety outcome occurred in 16 (23.2%) in the semaglutide group and 17 (23.9%) in the standard therapy group (adjusted RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.77–1.07, p=0.258). Primary efficacy outcome occurred in 39 (56.5%) in the semaglutide group and 39 (54.9%) in the standard therapy group (adjusted risk ratio 1.17, 95%CI 1.01–1.36, p=0.038). Secondary analyses stratified by IVT status were conducted in view of the small absolute risk difference in primary efficacy outcome, and evidence of treatment effect modification by IVT (Pinteraction 0.018). Primary efficacy outcome occurred in 22 (64.7%) patients in the semaglutide group and 15 (44.1%) patients in the standard therapy group (adjusted risk ratio 1.17, 95%CI 1.01–1.35, p=0.032) in the no-IVT stratum (n=68). Primary outcomes were similar between two groups in the IVT-stratum.
Conclusion: Semaglutide was safe and well-tolerated in patients with LVO within 12 hours of onset and was associated with improved neurological outcome in patients not receiving IVT. These preliminary observations should be confirmed in a large phase 3 trial. (NCT05920889)
  • Wang, Hao  ( Linyi People's Hospital , Linyi , China )
  • Ko, Ho  ( The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin , China )
  • Leung, Thomas  ( PRINCE OF WALES HOSPITAL , Hong Kong , Hong Kong )
  • Hu, Wei  ( University of Science and Technology of China , Hefei , China )
  • Che, Fengyuan  ( Linyi People's Hospital , Linyi , China )
  • Ip, Bonaventure Yiu Ming  ( The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin , China )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Hao Wang: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Ho Ko: No Answer | Thomas Leung: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Wei Hu: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Fengyuan Che: No Answer | Bonaventure Yiu Ming Ip: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Late-Breaking Science Oral Abstracts III

Thursday, 02/06/2025 , 02:00PM - 03:00PM

Oral Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A Trial of Patients Receiving Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Early Stroke (PRICES) in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines: An Open Label Study

Ang Kevin Royce, Juangco Dan, Hernandez Maria Kim

Acute Ischemic Stroke Patient Factors Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Favorable Collaterals and Successful Thrombectomy

Kesten Jamie, Mlynash Michael, Yuen Nicole, Seners Pierre, Wouters Anke, Schwartz Maya, Lansberg Maarten, Albers Gregory, Heit Jeremy

More abstracts from these authors:
You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)