Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: TMP109

Remote Ischemic Conditioning Treatment: A Study Report on Animal Stroke Model in Different Species, Sex, Age and Comorbidities from the Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN)

Abstract Body: Background: The Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network (SPAN), a multi-center network consisting of a coordinating center and testing laboratories, was created to enhance the rigor of preclinical research, including testing of potential therapies in animals of different species, sex, age, and co-morbidities, with blinding and randomization. SPAN evaluated six potential therapies with the goal of identifying one or more efficacious agents to advance toward a clinical trial. Remote ischemic post-conditioning (RIC) was selected as a candidate therapy for testing.
Methods: In Stage I, young, healthy mixed-sex mice were randomized into treatment groups by the coordinating center. In Stage II, aged mice, mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity, and spontaneously hypertensive rats were utilized. Each stage included 25% of the study population and efficacy/futility was determined after each stage. RIC was bilaterally administered as the first session occurred immediately after reperfusion, and the second session occurred as close as possible to 12 ± 2 hours at post-MCAo, using an automated blood pressure cuff that delivered 200-mmHg to the hindlimbs for 4 cycles x 5 minutes/cycle and then once per day x 5 days under anesthesia. Sham-conditioned animals were treated with a cuff that did not inflate. The primary outcome measure was a modified corner test on days 7 and 30 post-stroke. MRI was performed at 48 hours and 30 days. Probabilistic index models, which adjusted for covariates of interest, were fit to estimate the probability of a lower corner test index (better outcome) between sham and RIC.
Results: A total of 266 mice (132 sham, 134 RIC) were enrolled in the study, with 50 sham and 51 RIC-treated mice dying within 5 days of stroke. Analysis of all data revealed no significant differences in day 30 alternative corner test index between sham and RIC-treated mice after stroke in young, healthy mice (p=0.449), aged mice (p=0.079), mice with diet-induced obesity (p=0.135), or in spontaneously hypertensive rats (p=0.807). The secondary analysis found that RIC improved day 30 tissue infarction volume by MRI in young, healthy mice (p=0.024 vs. sham) but not in other co-morbid conditions.
Conclusions: After advancing through Stages I and II, RIC was deemed futile at the end of Stage II, as determined by the modified corner test on day 30. The requirement for repeated daily general anesthesia during RIC administration may have been a complicated factor.
  • Khan, Mohammad B.  ( Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Nagarkatti, Karisma  ( University of South California , Los Angeles , California , United States )
  • Lamb, Jessica  ( University of South California , Los Angeles , California , United States )
  • Lyden, Patrick  ( USC , Los Angeles , California , United States )
  • Kamat, Pradip  ( Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Siddiqui, Shahneela  ( Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Arbab, Ali  ( Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Hess, David  ( MEDICAL COLLEGE GEORGIA , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Dhandapani, Krishnan  ( Augusta University , Augusta , Georgia , United States )
  • Bedirian, Karni  ( Icahn School of Medicine , New York City , New York , United States )
  • Kodali, Hanish  ( Icahn School of Medicine , New York City , New York , United States )
  • Diniz, Marcio  ( Icahn School of Medicine , New York City , New York , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Mohammad B. Khan: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Karisma Nagarkatti: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Jessica Lamb: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Patrick Lyden: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Pradip Kamat: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Shahneela Siddiqui: No Answer | Ali Arbab: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | David Hess: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Krishnan DHANDAPANI: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Karni Bedirian: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Hanish Kodali: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Marcio Diniz: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:BloomerTech:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Comanche Biopharma:Active (exists now)
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Translational Basic Science Moderated Poster Tour II

Thursday, 02/06/2025 , 06:00PM - 07:00PM

Moderated Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Cardioprotective Role of Metformin: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis on Reducing Reperfusion Injury and Improving Endothelial Function

Notta Shahnawaz, Magacha Hezborn, Al Akeel Mohannad, Notta Nasir, Jagadish Ashwin, Jbara Manar, Ramu Vijay

Biodistribution of Systemically Administered Lab-grown, 3D Extracellular Matrix Particles and Their Effects on Post-Myocardial Infarction Cardiac Function

Broadwin Mark, Abid Ruhul, St Angelo Katerina, Petersen Max, Brinck Teixeira Rayane, Harris Dwight, Stone Christopher, Xu Cynthia, Sellke Frank, Morgan Jeffrey

More abstracts from these authors:
Deleted NLRP3 inflammasome improves functional outcome and improves cerebral blood flow in an experimental model of Vascular Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

Khan Mohammad B., Hess David, Siddiqui Shahneela, Kamat Pradip, Nisar Mohammad, Dua Ashraar, Murudkar Tej, Gill Hunarmeet, Santiago Urbauer Ana, Arbab Ali

Multicenter Stroke Preclinical Assessment Network analysis of cardiovascular risk factor subgroups treated with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor veliparib

Koehler Raymond, Diniz Marcio, Lamb Jessica, Nagarkatti Karisma, Lyden Patrick, Bedirian Karni, Chen Mu-hsun, Shi Yanrong, Cao Suyi, Avery Brooklyn, Karuppagounder Senthilkumar, Dawson Valina, Dawson Ted

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)