Logo

American Heart Association

  1
  0


Final ID: WP118

Lost to Follow-Up in Randomized Clinical Trials on Longer-Term Patient Management Following Stroke

Abstract Body: Background
Although long-term management following a stroke is crucial, many patients do not adhere to follow-up appointments, which pose a risk to the integrity of clinical trials. This systematic survey aimed to identify factors and potential impacts linked to lost to follow-up (LTFU) in stroke patients participating in long-term management trials, to enhance trial quality. Understanding LTFU is essential for informing patients, clinicians, and researchers for both clinical and research purposes.
Methods
An information specialist completed a comprehensive search of available data sources, including studies published up to June 15, 2024. Eligible articles included randomized trials that involved multimodal post-stroke care programs, initiated within one year after the stroke, with specified and assessed follow-up outcomes. We collected data on general trial characteristics and methodological characteristics for each study. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with LTFU. Additionally, we evaluated the relative risk of several assumptions about the outcomes of participants LTFU on the estimate of effect for the significant binary primary outcome.
Results
Of the 57 eligible reports identified, 6 (10.5%) did not specify whether LTFU occurred. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 60 months. The median proportion of subjects LTFU was 7.9% (interquartile range, 0–12.9%). Factors of LTFU increase on regression analysis were more study centers (beta=0.003 per center, P=0.017), higher proportion of females (beta=0.027 per percentage of 10, P=0.006), and non-protocol available (beta=-0.06, P=0.021) (Table 1, Fig.1). Patients were also more likely not to be lost if their providers were therapists (beta=-0.14, P=0.016) or rehabilitation team (beta=-0.12, P=0.038) compared to physician alone. In the trials that provided relevant data, results of 14.3% of trials were no longer significant if we assumed no participants LTFU had the event of interest, and 42.9% of trials were no longer significant if we assumed a worst-case scenario (Table 2).
Conclusion
Overall, nearly one-tenth of contemporary stroke trials on longer-term patient management still did not report LTFU. Identified modifiable risk factors may provide targets to improve the continuity of stroke management within these trial settings. Neurologists should pay close attention to how the participants are managed which may change the direction of the entire study.
  • Du, Peipei  ( Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China , Beijing , China )
  • Xu, Ziwen  ( Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China , Beijing , China )
  • Li, Yixuan  ( Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China , Beijing , China )
  • Zhang, Chi  ( Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China , Beijing , China )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Peipei Du: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Ziwen Xu: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Yixuan Li: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Chi Zhang: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:
Session Info:

Clinical Rehabilitation and Recovery Posters I

Wednesday, 02/05/2025 , 07:00PM - 07:30PM

Poster Abstract Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Association Between Imaging Follow Up and 1-Year Reintervention Risk After Peripheral Vascular Intervention for Claudicatio

Romain Gaelle, Smolderen Kim, Cleman Jacob, Callegari Santiago, Rahman Mufti, Knight Derek, Mena-hurtado Carlos

Cardiovascular Stroke Nursing Best Abstract Award: Digital Health-Based Interventions Improve Healthy Behaviors, Weight Loss, and Psychological Well-Being in Older Adults at Risk for Cardiovascular Diseas

Candelaria Dion, Reyes Andrew Thomas, Serafica Reimund, Hildebrand Janett, Cacciata Marysol, Sta. Maria Axel, Lee Jung-ah, Stromberg Anna, Evangelista Lorraine

More abstracts from these authors:
Benefits and Risks of Antiplatelet Versus Thrombolysis for Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke: Update of a Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Qin Mingzhen, Qi Baoyun, Shi Xinyi, Xu Dan, Zhou Congren, Cheng Sisong, Zhang Chi, Gao Ying

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available

Readers' Comments

We encourage you to enter the discussion by posting your comments and questions below.

Presenters will be notified of your post so that they can respond as appropriate.

This discussion platform is provided to foster engagement, and simulate conversation and knowledge sharing.

 

You have to be authorized to post a comment. Please, Login or Signup.


   Rate this abstract  (Maximum characters: 500)