Logo

American Heart Association

  57
  0


Final ID: Su2133

Safety and Efficacy of Moderate-Intensity Statin Plus Ezetimibe versus High-Intensity Statin in Older Adult Patients: A Meta-analysis

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction
Guidelines recommend high-intensity statin treatment for achieving target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in high-risk patients. Nonetheless, moderate-intensity statin use has been suggested as an alternative in older adult patients due to concerns about adverse effects. Whether a combination approach of a moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is superior to high-intensity statins in older adult patients for hypercholesterolemia is unknown.

Objective
We performed a meta-analysis comparing the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin monotherapy in older adult patients (≥65 years) with hypercholesterolemia.

Methods
PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception through May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin in older adults. Outcomes of interest were reduction in LDL-C levels (LDL-C <70 mg/dL or ≥50% reduction in LDL-C), muscle-related adverse effects, new-onset diabetes mellitus (DM), death, and treatment discontinuation due to drug-related adverse effects. Frequentist random-effects meta-analysis was performed to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results
Four RCTs with 2453 patients (moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe: 1218, 49.6%) were included. The rate of reduction in LDL-C levels (RR 1.2; 95% CI 1.04-1.38; p=0.011; I2=67.2%) was higher with the combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Muscle-related adverse effects (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.07-0.60; p=0.004; I2=0%) and new-onset DM (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.36-0.86; p=0.008; I2=0%) were lower with moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe compared with high-intensity statin. Death and treatment discontinuation were similar between the groups.

Conclusion
In older adult patients, combination therapy of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe demonstrated superior LDL-C reduction and a more favorable safety profile, with lower rates of muscle-related adverse effects and new-onset DM compared with high-intensity statin monotherapy. Moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe is a viable treatment option for older adult patients with hypercholesterolemia.
  • Joseph, Meghna  ( Medical College Thiruvananthapuram , Thodupuzha , India )
  • Nanna, Michael  ( Yale School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , United States )
  • Krishna, Mrinal  ( Medical College Thiruvananthapuram , Mavelikara , India )
  • Ezenna, Chidubem  ( UMass- Baystate Medical Center , Springfield , Massachusetts , United States )
  • Akman, Zafer  ( Yale School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , United States )
  • Rossi, Raiza  ( Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut , United States )
  • Chi, Kuan Yu  ( Jacobi Medical Center , Bronx , New York , United States )
  • Damluji, Abdulla  ( Cleveland Clinic , Cleveland , Ohio , United States )
  • Goldsweig, Andrew  ( Baystate Medical Center , West Hartford , Connecticut , United States )
  • Kutty, Shelby  ( Baycare Health , Clearwater , Florida , United States )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Meghna Joseph: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Michael Nanna: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:HeartFlow, Inc.:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Merck:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Novo Nordisk:Active (exists now) | Mrinal Krishna: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Chidubem Ezenna: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Zafer Akman: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Raiza Rossi: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Kuan Yu Chi: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Abdulla Damluji: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Andrew Goldsweig: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Consultant:Philips:Past (completed) ; Consultant:Occlutech:Active (exists now) ; Consultant:Conformal Medical:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Boston Scientific:Past (completed) ; Consultant:Abbott:Past (completed) | SHELBY KUTTY: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Lipid Management in the 21st Century: Progress and Promise in the Second Quarter

Sunday, 11/09/2025 , 03:15PM - 04:15PM

Abstract Poster Board Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Cardiologist Attitude to Lipid Control in Patients with ASCVD without Major Cardiovascular Events: Insights from the 2024 ACS EuroPath Survey

Zaman Azfar, De Caterina Raffaele, Schiele Francois, Sionis Alessandro, Catapano Alberico, Laufs Ulrich

Beyond the Octogenarian Threshold: A Nationwide, Multicenter Three-Year Analysis of Post-Ablation Safety Outcomes in Elderly Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Wang Yu-chiang, Hsieh Rebecca, Ahuja Rahul, Fu Yiwen, Sarcon Annahita, Rattanawong Pattara

More abstracts from these authors:
Duration of Potent P2Y12 Inhibitor-Based DAPT after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Frequentist Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis

Joseph Meghna, Goldsweig Andrew, Nanna Michael, Krishna Mrinal, Ezenna Chidubem, Akman Zafer, Rossi Raiza, Nouri Armin, Al Mouslmani Mohammad, Damluji Abdulla, Kutty Shelby

Comparative Efficacy of Limus-, and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis: A Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Ezenna Chidubem, Ibrahim Sammudeen, Nanna Michael, Goldsweig Andrew, Krishna Mrinal, Joseph Meghna, Chi Kuan Yu, Lee Pei-lun, Chinnatambi Christopher, Rossi Raiza, Khan Muhammad Ahmed, Nouri Armin

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available