Logo

American Heart Association

  27
  0


Final ID: MP143

Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Using Echocardiographic Imaging.

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background
Artificial intelligence (AI) may assist in diagnosing the most challenging subtype of aortic stenosis (AS) — low-gradient (LG) AS, characterized by a discordance between the mean aortic gradient and aortic valve area, making accurate assessment of stenosis severity difficult.

Hypothesis
AI models could differentiate between moderate and severe LGAS based solely on automatically-derived echocardiographic parameters, with clinically meaningful accuracy.

Methods
We included transthoracic echocardiograms from 158 out of 174 consecutive patients with suspected LGAS from the National Institute of Cardiology in Warsaw (moderate AS (n=82); severe AS (n=72)). Imaging-derived parameters (left ventricular internal diameter (LVID), interventricular septum thickness (IVS), left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPW) and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) were automatically extracted using two established EchoNet models (Dynamic and LVH), then used to train our model. A semi-automatic approach aditionally incorporated two manually derived Doppler parameters: stroke volume index (SVI) and Doppler velocity index (SVI) - available in 135 patients. Model performance was assessed using stratified cross-validation. Feature importance was evaluated using XGBoost's gain metric, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via bootstrapping.

Results
The semi-automatic model, based on six parameters, achieved an AUC of 0.853 (95% CI: 0.788–0.919), the fully automatic model achieved an AUC of 0.660 (95% CI: 0.568–0.752); DeLong’s test, p < 0.0005. (Figure 1) The semi-automatic model subgroup: (1) EchoNet + SVI yielded an AUC of 0.718 (95% CI: 0.632–0.805), (2) EchoNet + DVI yielded an AUC of 0.809 (95% CI: 0.735–0.882), (3) EchoNet + SVI + DVI achieved the highest performance, AUC = 0.853 (95% CI: 0.788–0.919). For fully automatic model applied to all 158 patients using the four imaging-derived parameters, performance improved modestly (AUC = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.640–0.798; p = 0.34). Feature importance analysis identified DVI and SVI as the most predictive parameters, followed by EF, LVID, IVS, and LVPW (Figure 2).

Conclusions.
Our findings indicate that AI models trained exclusively on imaging-based echocardiographic features can effectively distinguish low-gradient severe from moderate aortic stenosis. These models may assist in clinical evaluation, especially in diagnostically challenging cases, potentially minimizing the need for further diagnostic testing.
  • Wrzosek, Michal  ( National Institute of Cardiology , Warsaw , Poland )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Michal Wrzosek: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Transforming Cardiac Imaging and Risk Assessment Through AI

Saturday, 11/08/2025 , 12:15PM - 01:25PM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Angiography-derived FFR-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients undergoing Valve Surgery with Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease (FAVOR 4-QVAS): a Randomized Trial

Zhu Yunpeng, Guo Zhigang, Zhu Dan, Zhang Xiquan, Chen Liangwan, Redfors Bjorn, Sandner Sigrid, Gaudino Mario, Tu Shengxian, Zhao Qiang, Cheng Zhaoyun, Zhao Yuan, Zhang Wei, Han Lin, Zhang Chengxin, Yang Sumin, Ma Liang, Qiao Chenhui



A Case of Possible IgG4-Related Constrictive Pericarditis Masquerading as Idiopathic Pericarditis: A Rare and Elusive Diagnosis

Nandyal Shreyas, Sharma Bharosa, Gajjar Rohan, Varma Revati, Ezegwu Olisa, Amdetison Gedion Yilma, Tottleben Jon

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available