Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background:
Severe maternal hypertension is linked to adverse perinatal outcomes. Both nifedipine and hydralazine are commonly used antihypertensive agents in this setting.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to April 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing oral or sublingual nifedipine with intravenous hydralazine for the management of severe hypertension, with or without preeclampsia/eclampsia. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan.
Results:
Seven randomized controlled trials were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the two agents regarding time to achieve optimal blood pressure control (MD = -1.08 min, 95% CI = -6.66 to 4.49), caesarean delivery (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.38 to 1.03), neonatal birth weight (MD = 57.65g, 95% CI = -209.09 to -324.40), NICU admissions (OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.98), and 5-minute APGAR scores (MD = 0.1, 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.39). However, patients receiving nifedipine had significantly lower odds of experiencing medication-related adverse events (OR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.97).
Conclusion:
Nifedipine and intravenous hydralazine showed comparable efficacy in achieving optimal blood pressure control and similar maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, nifedipine was associated with significantly fewer maternal adverse effects, indicating superior tolerability.