Logo

American Heart Association

  24
  0


Final ID: Mo3130

Outcomes of Supraclavicular Access in Temporary Pacemaker Implantation

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Temporary pacemakers (TPM) are often placed using femoral, jugular, or subclavian veins, but these approaches have risks like pneumothorax or lead dislodgement. The supraclavicular route may offer a safer alternative, but data is limited.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we assessed 3,569 patients who got a TPM at a tertiary hospital (2020–2024). Of these, 1,644 had supraclavicular access, and 1,925 had infraclavicular access. We compared success rates, complications, and procedure times. Data came from medical records, and all analyses were performed using SPSS v26.
Results: The study compared outcomes between supraclavicular (n=1,644) and infraclavicular (n=1,925) approaches for temporary pacemaker implantation in 3,569 patients. Baseline characteristics were well-matched between groups, with similar age (63.7 vs 64.1 years), sex distribution (56.3% vs 55.7% male), and comorbidity profiles (all p>0.05). The supraclavicular approach demonstrated superior safety outcomes, with significantly lower overall complication rates (9.3% vs 14.8%, p<0.001), including reduced arterial puncture (2.0% vs 4.2%), pneumothorax (0.3% vs 1.1%), lead dislodgement (4.5% vs 6.8%), and hematoma formation (1.5% vs 2.7%). Multivariate analysis identified supraclavicular access as independently protective against complications (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.48-0.73), along with younger age and normal renal function. Procedural efficiency favored the supraclavicular approach, with shorter mean procedure times (24.6 vs 29.1 minutes, p<0.001) and higher first-attempt success rates (89.4% vs 83.2%, p<0.001). Predictive modeling showed excellent discrimination for complications (AUC 0.73), while survival analysis confirmed prolonged complication-free intervals with supraclavicular access (log-rank p=0.01).
Conclusion: Supraclavicular access for TPM is safer, faster, and more successful than the traditional infraclavicular approach. It should be considered as a first-choice method, especially in emergencies.
  • Khan, Saifullah  ( Army Medical College , Rawalpindi , Pakistan )
  • Amanullah, Khadija  ( Franciscan Health , Olympia Fields , Illinois , United States )
  • Malik, Jahanzeb  ( Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology , Rawalpindi , Pakistan )
  • Ramzy, Silvia  ( Franciscan Health , Olympia Fields , Illinois , United States )
  • Amanullah, Yusra  ( Army Medical College , Rawalpindi , Pakistan )
  • Khan, Javeria  ( Khyber Medical College , Peshawar , Pakistan )
  • Amanullah, Mubaraka  ( Army Medical College , Rawalpindi , Pakistan )
  • Javaid, Rabiah  ( Army Medical College , Rawalpindi , Pakistan )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Saifullah Khan: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Khadija Amanullah: No Answer | Jahanzeb Malik: No Answer | Silvia Ramzy: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Yusra Amanullah: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Javeria Khan: No Answer | Mubaraka Amanullah: No Answer | Rabiah Javaid: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Cerebrovascular Disease: Aortic, Branch Vessel, and Carotid Issues

Monday, 11/10/2025 , 10:30AM - 11:30AM

Abstract Poster Board Session

More abstracts on this topic:
A Novel Technique in Managing Equipment Entrapment: A Complicated Case of Aortic Valvuloplasty Balloon Rupture and Detachment

Abdelsalam Mahmoud, Ezaldin Shady, Abu-halimah Shadi, Han Richard

A Meta-Analysis Comparing Same-Day Discharge to Later-Day Discharge in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Jain Hritvik, Passey Siddhant, Jain Jyoti, Goyal Aman, Wasir Amanpreet, Ahmed Mushood, Patel Nandan, Yadav Ashish, Shah Janhvi, Mehta Aryan

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available