Logo

American Heart Association

  19
  0


Final ID: MP1477

Exercise Response to Bisoprolol and Verapamil treatment in Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Introduction
Beta blockers (BB) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) are recommended in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) based on limited documentation.
Hypothesis
BB and CCB enhance the cardiovascular response to exercise in patients with non-obstructive HCM.
Methods
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled triple-crossover trial, patients with non-obstructive HCM (Left ventricular wall thickness ≥15 mm and left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mmHg), and ≥1 marker of disease severity: NYHA class ≥II, NT-proBNP >300 ng/L, or non-sustained ventricular tachycardi were included. Each patient underwent three treatment periods with daily target doses of bisoprolol 7.5 mg, verapamil 360 mg and placebo. The main outcomes, compared to placebo, were oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), anaerobic threshold (AT), ventilatory volume/carbon dioxide output (VE/VCO2) slope, as marker of ventilatory efficiency, rate-pressure product (RPP), as marker of myocardial work and O2-pulse, as marker of stroke volume. Outcomes were evaluated by a cardiopulmonary exercise test after two weeks of steady state treatment.
Results
Thirty-two patients aged 54 years were included. At peak exercise, bisoprolol reduced VO2 to 25.7±8.7 mL/kg/min (-2.5 mL/kg/min, p=0.002) compared to placebo. Bisoprolol further reduced HR (-37 min-1, p<0.001), diastolic BP (-16 mmHg, p=0.007), RPP (-7234 min-1× mmHg, p<0.001), and increased O2-pulse (+3.30 mL/beat, p<0.001). At peak exercise, verapamil reduced VO2 to 28.2±8.6 mL/kg/min (-0.7 mL/kg/min, p=0.990) compared to placebo. Verapamil further reduced HR (-17 min-1, p<0.001) and increased O2-pulse (+1.58 mL/beat, p=0.001) at peak exercise, but RPP, systolic and diastolic BP were unchanged. The VO2 at AT and the VE/VCO2 slope were unchanged for both bisoprolol and verapamil compared to placebo. At rest, bisoprolol reduced HR (-13 min-1, p<0.001), systolic BP (-8 mmHg, p=0.002), diastolic BP (-7 mmHg, p<0.001), RPP (-3005 min-1× mmHg, p<0.001), and increased O2-pulse, (+2.73 mL/beat, p<0.001). Resting VO2 was unchanged. Verapamil reduced resting HR (-6 min-1, p<0.001), diastolic BP (-5 mmHg, p=0.010), RPP (-1212 min-1× mmHg, p<0.001), but resting systolic BP, VO2 and O2-pulse were unchanged.
Conclusion
Bisoprolol significantly reduced oxygen consumption and estimates of myocardial work at peak exercise compared to placebo, while verapamil did not affect these markers significantly compared to placebo.
  • Bjerregaard, Louise  ( Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark )
  • Dybro, Anne  ( Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark )
  • Saaby, Lotte  ( Odense University Hospital , Odense , Denmark )
  • Poulsen, Steen  ( Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark )
  • Rasmussen, Torsten  ( Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus N , Denmark )
  • Jensen, Morten  ( Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Louise Bjerregaard: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | Anne Dybro: DO have relevant financial relationships ; Advisor:Cytokinetics:Active (exists now) ; Speaker:Bristol myers squibb:Past (completed) | Lotte Saaby: No Answer | Steen Poulsen: No Answer | Torsten Rasmussen: No Answer | Morten Jensen: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2025

2025

New Orleans, Louisiana

Session Info:

Under Pressure: Exercise, Risk, and Real-World Predictors in Cardiovascular Disease

Sunday, 11/09/2025 , 03:15PM - 04:15PM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Effect of Medical-Grade Mask Use on Exercise Physiology in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Crossover Study

Lee Ju-hee, Lee Goo Joo, Kang Mingyu, Eom Sang Yong

Combined Efficacy, Safety, and Test Dose Tolerability of Etripamil for Acute Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia (PSVT) Across Multiple Clinical Trials

Ip James, Noseworthy Peter, Piccini Jonathan P., Pokorney Sean, Singh Narendra, Stambler Bruce, Bharucha David, Camm Alan

More abstracts from these authors:
Effect of Aficamten versus Metoprolol Monotherapy on Biomarkers in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The MAPLE-HCM Trial

Lakdawala Neal, Burroughs Melissa, Claggett Brian, Costabel Juan, Correia Edileide, Dybro Anne, Elliott Perry, Kulac Ian, Lewis Gregory, Mann Amy, Nair Ajith, Garcia-pavia Pablo, Poulsen Steen, Reant Patricia, Schulze Christian, Solomon Scott, Wang Andrew, Sohn Regina, Berhane Indrias, Heitner Stephen, Jacoby Daniel, Kupfer Stuart, Maron Martin, Malik Fady, Wohltman Amy, Fifer Michael, Januzzi James, Masri Ahmad, Merkely Béla, Nassif Michael, Pena Pena Maria Luisa, Barriales-villa Roberto, Bilen Ozlem

Clinical Responses to Aficamten Monotherapy Compared with Metoprolol Monotherapy for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Outcomes and Disease Burden: MAPLE-HCM Responder Analysis

Wang Andrew, Claggett Brian, Costabel Juan, Correia Edileide, Dybro Anne, Elliott Perry, Kulac Ian, Lakdawala Neal, Lewis Gregory, Mann Amy, Nair Ajith, Garcia-pavia Pablo, Poulsen Steen, Reant Patricia, Schulze Christian, Solomon Scott, Sohn Regina, Berhane Indrias, Heitner Stephen, Jacoby Daniel, Kupfer Stuart, Malik Fady, Masri Ahmad, Wohltman Amy, Fifer Michael, Maron Martin, Merkely Bela, Nassif Michael, Pena Pena Maria Luisa, Barriales-villa Roberto, Bilen Ozlem, Burroughs Melissa

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available