Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Ventricular arrhythmias are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are commonly used to prevent sudden cardiac death in these patients. However, patients with ICDs frequently experience recurrent arrhythmias and inappropriate shocks, which can impact their quality of life. Beta-blockers, specifically carvedilol and metoprolol, are commonly prescribed to manage these arrhythmias. This meta-analysis aims to compare the impact of both medications in this patient population.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify relevant studies comparing carvedilol to metoprolol in patients with ventricular arrhythmias or ICDs. Study outcomes included all-cause mortality, recurrent ventricular arrhythmia, and inappropriate ICD shocks. Effect estimates are presented as hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: 1,453 studies were identified through database search. After full-text screening, a total of 5 studies involving 9,292 patients were included. We found no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent ventricular arrhythmias between carvedilol and metoprolol (HR = 0.99, 95% CI [0.75, 1.32], P = 0.97). Additionally, Carvedilol showed a trend toward reduction of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.68, 1.03], P = 0.09). On the other hand, Carvedilol was associated with a statistically significant reduction of inappropriate ICD shocks (HR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.48, 0.78], P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Carvedilol may offer additional benefits over metoprolol in managing patients with ventricular arrhythmias or ICDs, particularly in minimizing the incidence of inappropriate ICD shocks. However, no significant difference was found in terms of all-cause mortality and recurrent ventricular arrhythmia incidence. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical decision-making.