Logo

American Heart Association

  11
  0


Final ID: MDP852

Impact of left ventricular support devices on myocardial and pulmonary recovery in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background:
Venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is used to treat cardiogenic shock. However, retrograde arterial perfusion from the femoral artery can increase left ventricular (LV) afterload, resulting in LV distention which may hamper myocardial recovery and worsen pulmonary congestion. An intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) can mitigate LV afterload, and Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) can directly unload LV pressure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LV support devices during VA-ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock.
Methods:
We retrospectively collected data from 213 consecutive patients treated with VA-ECMO due to cariogenic shock at our institution between January 2013 and December 2023. Patients were categorized as either receiving VA-ECMO alone or VA-ECMO with an LV support device. The LV support device was characterized as VA-ECMO with IABP or Impella. Data were analyzed for mortality, weaning from VA-ECMO, and changes in pulmonary congestion using the congestion score index (CSI), which is a semi-quantitative approach to pulmonary congestion based on a 6-zone evaluation of chest radiography, scoring each zone from 0 (no congestion) to 3 (intense pulmonary edema).
Results:
In this study, 95 patients received VA-ECMO alone, whereas 118 patients received an LV support device (101 VA-ECMO with IABP and 17 VA-ECMO with Impella). LV support devices improved weaning from VA-ECMO (odds ratio, 3.09 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.75–5.55]; p<0.0001) whereas there was no difference in IABP versus Impella cohorts. Compared with VA-ECMO alone, patients with VA-ECMO with an LV support device had better survival at 30 days (OR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.73–5.43]; p<0.0001). The rate of survival to discharge was better in VA-ECMO with an LV support device versus VA-ECMO alone (hazard ratio, 2.51 [95% CI, 1.72–3.65]; p<0.0001). The evaluation of pulmonary congestion using the CSI revealed that congestion significantly improved in VA-ECMO with Impella (changes of CSI: 1.86 to 1.36) but not in VA-ECMO with IABP (1.80 to 1.96) and VA-ECMO alone (1.94 to 2.14).
Conclusion:
An LV support device may be associated with reduced mortality and increased success in weaning off VA-ECMO in patients with cardiogenic shock. Impella may be particularly effective in reducing pulmonary congestion.
  • Masaru, Ishida  ( Sakai General Medical Center , Sakai , Osaka , Japan )
  • Ryomoto, Masaaki  ( Rinku General Medical Center , Izumisano , Osaka , Japan )
  • Funatsu, Toshihiro  ( Rinku General Medical Center , Izumisano , Osaka , Japan )
  • Author Disclosures:
    Ishida Masaru: DO NOT have relevant financial relationships | MASAAKI RYOMOTO: No Answer | Toshihiro Funatsu: No Answer
Meeting Info:

Scientific Sessions 2024

2024

Chicago, Illinois

Session Info:

Temporary and Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support in Heart Failure Management

Sunday, 11/17/2024 , 09:30AM - 10:45AM

Moderated Digital Poster Session

More abstracts on this topic:
Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Novel, Video-Based CPR and AED Education Program in Canadian Schools

Allan Katherine, Dhillon Santokh, Mcculloch Holly, Ruether Kim, Zotzman Jeanine, Blanchard Ian, Janczyszyn Mike, Wong Natalie, Oneil Emma, Sapp John

Analysis of Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Response to Asphyxial Hemodynamics in an Infant Swine Model of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Jackson Aaron, Gumucio Jorge, Menegazzi James, Salcido David

You have to be authorized to contact abstract author. Please, Login
Not Available