Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a treatment that requires attention in terms of infection control, as it necessitates aseptic procedures similar to surgical operations. However, surveillance practices for PCI-related infections are uncommon, and no standardized surveillance program has been established.
Purpose：To assess the feasibility of using existing surveillance methods to detect PCI-related infectious diseases.
Method: To identify PCI-related bloodstream infections of local access sites, four existing case definitions, namely, laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections (LCBI), clinical sepsis (CSEP), local access site infection (LASI), and exit site infection (ESI), were retrospectively applied to 1,037 patients who underwent PCI between April 2018 and March 2021. Of these, 167 experienced fever, underwent blood culture testing, and/or received antibiotics within 6 days of PCI. To confirm consistent evaluation, two independent infection control experts evaluated each case record according to the four case definitions.
Results: Twenty-three patients (2.2%) were diagnosed with PCI-related infections, including two patients according to LCBI, 21 according to CSEP, and none according to LASI and ESI. Thirteen patients (LCBI: 1, CSEP: 12) received circulatory assist devices such as intra-aortic balloon pumping. Of the remaining 11 patients, 10 underwent emergency PCI, and one underwent elective PCI (P =0.0001). The average length of hospital stay was 16.1 days for patients with PCI-related infections and 4.7 days for non-infected patients (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The positive diagnosis of PCI-related infections was predominantly based on CSEP. Many of these positive patients underwent emergency PCI and/or received circulatory assist devices. The results of the present study warrant further investigations with larger patient cohorts.