Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): BACKGROUND
There are racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in hypertension control, even in populations with regular care. It is unclear if clinical inertia by clinicians contributes to these disparities.

OBJECTIVES
To quantify racial/ethnic and SES disparities in treatment intensification (TI) among adults with hypertension.

METHODS
We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records from Johns Hopkins primary care practices from January 2018 to December 2022. We included non-Hispanic Black (Black) and non-Hispanic White (White) adults with at least 2 elevated blood pressure readings (>=140/90 mm Hg) in the 12 months prior to the index primary care visit and a diagnosis of essential hypertension. We excluded patients with diagnoses of end-stage renal disease, liver disease, dementia, and metastatic solid tumor. Patients could contribute multiple index visits. We measured SES using the national Area Deprivation Index, which comprises 17 neighborhood-level SES indicators, and dichotomized the population into high and low median SES groups. We defined TI as a change in antihypertensive class or dose increase within 14 days of the index visit. We balanced covariates reflecting clinical need at the index visit (age, sex, blood pressure readings, cardiometabolic comorbidities, body mass index) and the index visit’s calendar time across racial/ethnic and SES groups using inverse probability weighting. We estimated annual race/ethnic and SES specific TI rates and risk difference measures of disparity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a clustered bootstrap.

RESULTS
The cohort included 25,287 patients (11,800 Black, 13,487 White) with 79,898 eligible visits. Black patients were more often younger, female, and residing in low SES areas compared to White patients. In 2018, TI rates for Black patients (37%, 95% CI: 36-38%) were slightly lower than rates for White patients (39%, 95% CI: 38-40%). In 2022, the disparity persisted, with the Black patients’ TI rate lower by 3% (95% CI: -5%, -1%). Similarly, low SES patients had lower TI rates than high SES patients by 2% to 3% over the study period.

CONCLUSION
Black patients and those from low SES consistently had modestly lower rates of TI compared to White patients and those from high SES. It will be important to identify the drivers and clinical implications of these treatment disparities.