Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background: Heart failure (HF) remains a leading cause of hospital admissions, with high morbidity, mortality, and projected healthcare costs of $70 billion by 2030. Effective management of the patient’s volume status is crucial in managing symptom burden, preventing rehospitalization, and thus reducing healthcare expenses. In 2017, UNC Hospital opened an ambulatory diuresis clinic to address this issue. Aim: This retrospective cohort study evaluates the cost and rehospitalization rates of HF patients treated in the ambulatory diuresis clinic versus those receiving inpatient diuresis at the hospital.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,950 unique HF patients from August 2017 to September 2023, treated with IV diuresis at UNC Hospital or its outpatient clinic. Patients were classified into a clinic cohort, who visited the diuresis clinic at least once, and a non-clinic cohort, who never visited and were defined by a primary HF diagnosis with an ED/observation visit or inpatient stay ≤ two days. The primary outcome measured was average readmissions per cohort; the secondary outcome included total charges from billing records. Rehospitalization and mortality rates were tracked via EHR. Statistical analyses, including descriptive and inferential statistics, were conducted to compare costs and outcomes between the two groups.

Results: This study compared 996 patients in the clinic group with 1,954 in the non-clinic group, noting similar baseline characteristics of average ages of 66.80 and 67.24 years, BMIs of 33.95 and 33.73 kg/m^2, and one-year all-cause mortality rates of 21.18% and 22.77%, respectively. Average admissions per cohort were higher for the clinic group one year prior to the index visit—0.159 vs. 0.127—but decreased post-index visit: by six months, admissions were 0.094 for the clinic and 0.161 for the non-clinic; at one year, they were 0.133 and 0.210, respectively. Financially, the clinic group incurred $7,895 less in charges during the index visit and had lower total costs one-year post-index, at $17,785 compared to $23,982 for the non-clinic group.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that outpatient diuresis at UNC Hospital is more cost-effective than inpatient diuresis for HF patients and reduces rehospitalization rates at six months and one-year post-index visit. These results suggest that outpatient diuresis is cost-effective, may enhance patient outcomes, and could alleviate the strain on healthcare resources.