Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background
The development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) has emerged as a substantial barrier to interventional treatment for coronary heart disease. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an efficacious interventional technique for the management of ISR. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of DCB in the treatment of ISR with that of an uncoated balloon (UCB).
Methods
We comprehensively searched literature on MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and clinicaltrials.gov using MeSH terms and relevant keywords for “Balloon Angioplasty” and “in-stent Restenosis” from inception to June 1, 2024, followed by a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess both strategies for treatment of ISR. Random effects model was used to aggregate the risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
The search strategy retrieved 2330 studies. Duplicates and irrelevant articles were removed and data from seven RCTs (1,408 patients) was extracted. The mean age ranged from 64 to 74 years. The mean clinical follow-up ranged from 1 to 10 years. DCB was found to be superior to UCB at latest follow up in terms of target lesion revascularization (TLR) (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.19-0.58; p 0.0001; I2 79%), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.73; p 0.003; I2 84%), late lumen loss (LLL) (MD -0.46 mm, 95% CI -0.64- -0.28]; p <0.00001; I2 64%), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.70; p 0.0003; I2 67%). The two groups were comparable at latest follow up in terms of mortality (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.65-1.16; p 0.35; I2 0%), cardiac death (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.66-1.19; p 0.43; I2 0%), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.39-1.24; p 0.22; I2 28%) and stent thrombosis (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04-1.10; p 0.06; I2 46%).
Conclusion
DCB showed promising results in the treatment of patients with coronary ISR. DCB outperformed UCB in significantly reducing TLR, MACE, LLL and TVR risks. The risk of mortality, cardiac death, MI, and stent thrombosis was similar between DCB and UCB.
