Abstract Body (Do not enter title and authors here): Background
Leadless cardiac pacemakers (LCP) have evolved as an excellent alternative to transvenous pacemaker (TVPM) for bradycardia therapy with excellent safety and efficacy outcomes. Micra^TM was the first commercially available LCP. The device attaches to the right ventricular myocardium with four Nitinol FlexFix™tines. Its inherent design poses problems with retrievability. This leads to many devices being turned off and left behind in the right ventricle at the end of its life. The Aveir retrieval catheter was recently launched as part of the Aveir family of LCP and has a tri-loop snare re-docking mechanism, steerability, and protective sleeve.

Goals
We aim to show the safety and efficacy of using this novel retrieval catheter for extraction of the Micra™ LCP in lieu of abandoning the LCP in the right ventricle.

Results
We present a case series of 8 successful retrievals of Micra™ LCP using the Aveir™ retrieval catheter. Four patients had the LCP removed during upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy and the other four had the LCP removed at the time of replacement of the LCP at device end-of-life. The mean age of the cohort was 72.6±9.4 years (62.5% female). The average age of the retrieved LCP was 4 years and 4 months with the oldest device being in place for 7 years and 7 months. Median retrieval time, defined as time from retrieval catheter in to retrieval catheter out, was 4.8±2.4 minutes. In 100% of the cases the LCP was successfully retrieved in its entirety via femoral venous access. There were no intra- or post-procedural complications, including vascular complications, pericardial effusions, right ventricular dysfunction or worsening tricuspid regurgitation. At six months follow up, patients continued to remain free of the above complications.

Conclusion
This case series demonstrates the safety and feasibility of using the Aveir™ retrieval catheter for extraction of the Micra™ LCP device in lieu of abandonment. Additional studies should be considered to assess the risk and benefits of abandoning the device in the right ventricle extraction of the LCP with this novel technique. The authors acknowledge the steep learning curve associated with this procedure. Further multicenter analysis of this technique is necessary to determine its generalizability.